Mikä on parasta. Com,. Net,. Info,. Org,. Minua. Meitä?
Nyt minä useing. Info sillä vain 1 $ vuodessa.

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 4:35 am
Brent Hodgson vastasi:

Kenny menee läpi. Com,. Org,. Net,. Info ja. Biz on ensimmäinen video, ja sivuaa ccTLD (vaikka ei erikseen. Minua. Meidät) ja niiden parhaasta käytöstä on toinen video.

Kannattaa toisen näyttää.

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 15:49
Lane vastasi:

Olisin kiinnostunut hänen ajatuksiaan. Meille

27. maaliskuuta 2010 at 6:30 am
Bob Stephenson vastasi:

. Info on ok käyttää, jos et aio tehdä yli $ 1 vuosi kyseisen sivuston ...

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 8:36 am
Paul B vastasi:

Rakastan älypää kommentteja niin. Eräs. Info tekeekin yli 10k kuukaudessa affiliate myynti kaikkea orgaanista liikennettä. . Tv tekee enemmän päivässä kuin mitä useimmat ihmiset (mukaan lukien online-markkinoijat) tekemäsi kuukaudessa.

SEO verkkotunnuksissa Google on yhtä helppoa kuin saat, ne yksityiskohdat mitä he tekevät ja eivät pidä.

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 15:25
Lane vastasi:

Paul,

Mistä ne yksityiskohdat tästä?

Kiitos.

Kaista

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 10:09 am
Vincent vastasi:

Ei välttämättä.
Minulla on. Info verkkotunnuksen, joka on saavuttanut Google PR4 ja top listalle sen avainsanaa ja myy 9 dollaria tuote säännöllisesti myyntiin.

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 11:18 am
Bob Stephenson vastasi:

(Mikä on parasta. Com,. Net,. Info,. Org,. Minua. Meitä?
Nyt minä useing. Info sillä vain 1 $ vuodessa.)

Selventävät ja anteeksipyynnön ... En laskemisen. Info sivustoja. Tietenkin he voivat tehdä hyvää rahaa kuin muita laajennuksia. Olin sanomassa, ja aio loukata, että jos avainsanan kannattaa mennä jälkeen, niin älä välitä säästöt välillä. Com tai. Info. (Jos. Com on saatavilla)

Kiitos siivoamalla kysymykseeni. Net ja. Org. En ole koskaan oikein saanut näin paljon yksityiskohtia aiheesta.

Kokemukseni mukaan. Org toimii paremmin SEO kuin. Net. Se voi olla, miksi meillä on useita satoja heistä ja myydä niitä kuin kuumille kiville.

Erinomainen katsaus. Haluaisin kuulla teidän ajatuksia ostaa, rakentamiseen, myynti verkkotunnuksia. Erityisesti joitakin esimerkkejä. Onko tämä mahdollista?

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 4:37 am
Brent Hodgson vastasi:

Stay tuned - Kenny on ollut tuottaa sisältöä kuin mies tulessa. Aiomme nähdä kuinka paljon pääsemme tulevina päivinä - mutta jos menetämme muutaman kysymyksen aikarajoitusten vuoksi, meidän pitäisi kysyä Kenny takaisin myöhemmin?

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 5:11 am
MauFournier vastasi:

Kyllä kiitos!

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 7:38 am
Gary Dean vastasi:

YES! kaikin mokomin! Mutta emme halua Kenny alkaa toimia kuten jälleen "guru" ...
Keep 'em tulossa ..
Keep 'em yksinkertaista ...
ja pysyä nöyränä ...

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 9:19 am
Viviane vastasi:

Brent, vain pitää Kenny teidän MS Dungeon jotta voit herättää hänet, kun meillä on kysymys. Ainakin, et voi leikata hänet vapaaksi, kunnes hän paljastaa kaiken remontti verkkotunnukset ja myy tai vielä parempaa leasing ...

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 10:03 am
Obikodi vastasi:

Useimmat varmasti

Yksi asia, jota haluaisin nähdä piiriin on todellinen tärkeysjärjestykseen hankintaan kaikkein SEO optimoitu domain name.

Esimerkiksi - paras verkkotunnukset järjestyksessä:

1 - keyword.com
2 - keywordsuffix.com
3 - avainsanoilla suffix.com
4 - keyword.org
5 - avainsanoilla suffix.org
6 - prefix-keyword.com

ja jne jne.

Listat kuten nämä voi varmasti tehdä eroa kun kilpailevat verkossa tänään, koska se antaa meille tehokkaan oikotien tulokset olemme kaikki jahtaavat - kuten ohjelmisto!

Ja nykypäivän markkinoilla pieni ja nopea lyöntiä iso ja hidas.

Kiitos niin hyvä artikkeli! Mielestäni oli erittäin informatiivinen ja hyödyllinen

Kiitos pojat niin paljon! Olen todella ihmetellyt mitä laajennukset ovat parasta, jos et voi saada. Com avainsanallesi. Minulla on kysymys kuitenkin. Jos pystyt saamaan keyword.org tai keywordonline.com joka sinun pitäisi mennä? Onko laajennus tai avainsanan tiheys on enemmän veto Google?

Kiitos tästä mahtava artikkeli!

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 5:07 am
Kenny Goodman vastasi:

Jos kaikki muut tekijät ovat samat ja SEO syistä vain - haluaisin mennä. Org koko päivän

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 6:33 am
Quincy | viha hallinta luokat vastasi:

Hyvä kysymys Lucas.

Omasta tutkimus, esimerkiksi että annat, olet parempi saada keyword.org päälle keywordonline.com

Olen nähnyt lukemattomia tarkka lause. Netin ja. Org sijoitus ensimmäisellä sivulla, yli ilmaushakuina. Com

Tämän sanoi, valitaan ilmaushaun. Com,. Net tai. Org, tekee paremmin kuin tarkan muotoilun vuoksi. Biz,. Info,. Minua jne.

Nämä ovat omat kokemukset, sekä havaintoja tehtäessä avainsanan tutkimusta.

Maaliskuun 31. 2010 klo 4:01 am
Victory Blogi mallit | Lucas sanoi:

Kiitos Quincy

Awesome info here - innolla ensi erässä.
Kippis.

Fantastic! Vuosien mittaan olen katsellut lukuisia keskusteluja yli kysymyksiin. Mitä aiemmin SEO postitse, uskon että on aivan totta. Rakensin sivusto, joka oli tarkka ottelu avainsanan, joka oli kilpailun monista viranomainen sivustoja, mutta ei paljon tarkka haku kilpailu.

Sitten asentanut WordPress, ja jätti sen yksin kahden viikon ajan (tekemättä mitään - en edes lisätä mitään uusia virkoja). Kun olen ollut indeksoitu, sain ensimmäisellä sivulla Google! Ei käänteisiä, ei sisältöä. Sniping avainsanat, joita etsitään ja tulevaisuudessa ja saada. Com suoralta kädeltä on hyvä tapa edetä.

Olen myös ollut parempaa kokemuksia. Org ohi. Net on, mutta minulla on tapana pitää tutkimiseen asti. Com on käytettävissä.

Suuri tietoa aloittelijoille ja asiantuntijoiden keskuudessa. Kiitos kaverit! Voit aina tarjota laadukasta tietoa.

Käytän Alitoimialueet kaiken aikaa AdWords saada parempaa laatua pisteet.
Mitä ajattelet aliverkkotunnukset kuin koskee ranking SEO

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 15:30
Lane vastasi:

Toimiiko se hyvin sinulle vai ei?

Mitä jos piste com verkkotunnus koostuu 4 tai 5 sanaa ja silti ala on tarkka avainsana etsitään? Onko haittaa ottaa pitkä domain 18-25 sanoja? Olen löytänyt melko paljon avainsanoja, jos kyseinen verkkotunnus on käytettävissä kohtuullisen liikennettä ja kilpailua on vähän.

Laadukkaita videoita Kenny BTW! Innolla näkemään enemmän.

Pietari
Altrincham
Cheshire Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta

27. maaliskuuta 2010 at 6:34 am
Kenny Goodman vastasi:

Jos kohdistaminen täsmälleen hännän hokeman niin tämä olisi täydellinen verkkotunnus.

Kenny:

Kiitos tiedoista. Se saa minut tuntuu siltä, ​​että valoa lopussa tunneli ole junan peräisin toiseen suuntaan.
Omistan 250 + / - yleinen. Com verkkotunnuksia keskittynyt graafisen / painoteollisuus. Ne liittyvät erityisesti koneiden ja tarvikkeiden, kulutushyödykkeet, joita käytetään painoalalla.

Olen saanut näitä jopa 10 vuotta. Mikäli mahdollista Ostin yksikkö / monikko ja ei tavutettavien / väliviivalliset verkkotunnusversiota.

En ole koskaan pystynyt tuottamaan mitään kiinnostusta joku minun alan ostaa domain-aloilla, leasing domain-aloilla, tai kanssamme kehittämään domain-verkkotunnuksia omaan käyttöönsä.

Ne ovat kehittymättömät ja yksinkertaisesti pysäköity jossa verkkotunnusten rekisteröijä on osanneet jotain hyötyä jolla mainokset "varatun verkkotunnuksen sivuilla"

Olisin mielellään vastaan ​​ajatuksia, ehdotuksia, palautetta olet katsojat.

Ken Stein

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 7.45
Ray vastasi:

Ken!
Hanki Thos verkkotunnukset ja SLAP ne kanssa wordpress - sietää 100 sanaa ja tietoa siitä, mitä he aikovat olla ja antaa heille nimen otsikossa. Asenna oikea plugins ja sietää adsense jotta voit ansaita rahaa! Dont 'antaa sen pois hosting-yritys. Jos tarvitset apua, miten sitten lähettää minulle sähköpostia
onlinemarketingx at gmail piste com
Mitä tuhlausta - ja kymmenen vuotta! Kuulen ya mies ... että olisi saada minut alas ...

28. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 12:35 am
Ken Stein vastasi:

Ray:

Kiitos vastauksesta.

Näin minun rekisterinpitäjä (domainguru.net) on perustettu, en voinut käyttää Wordpress laittaa vähän sisältöä verkkotunnuksissa. Haluaisin pitää käyttää perus maksutta web ohjelmistojen kehittäminen. Jotenkin kun yritin tässä muutama vuosi sitten, niiden ohjelmistot ja tietokoneen taistelivat. Niiden ohjelmisto voitti ja se lukita tietokoneeseen. En ole tietokoneen taju, joten olen vain pudotti sen.

Voisin siirtyä verkkotunnuksia jossa minulla on tällä hetkellä minun toimivia web sivustoa (www.graphic-equipment.com), mutta ne vastaanottava 200 + verkkotunnuksia yhtäkkiä tuo 100 dollaria n dollareita kuukaudessa rahani panostusta.

Vain web ohjelmistojen kehittäminen että minulla ole aavistustakaan siitä, ja täytyy opetella, on FrontPage 2003.

Olen pitänyt yrittää oppia Joomla. Heillä pikkuilmoitukset ohjelma, joka olisi täydellinen käytettäväksi useita sivustoja, jotka haluan kehittää auttaa jälleenmyyjille / laitteiden omistajat markkinoida tietyn valmistajan / tuotetyypin. Näiden alueiden tulisi optimoida tuotteita käyttäen parasta seo tekniikoita.

Jälleen kiitos
Ken Stein

28. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 7:42 am
Rick vastasi:

Ken,

You can install Wordpress via Fantistico from most Control Panels in my experience, very easily. As stated before filling with minimal content to get the traffic for yourself rather than allowing the hosting company to profit. I certainly am not a webmaster but found Fantastico very simple to use coupled with Filezilla for FTP.

On March 30th, 2010 at 10:17 am
Ray replied:

Ken, as I said, please email me as I would not post the info here. You are making your life waaaay too complicated mate! Ray

On March 27th, 2010 at 8:11 am
Rebecca from ModernMarketer replied:

Ken,

Why don't you park them somewhere that YOU make money, like SEDO or Parked.com or some place. You are free to park your domains and make money from them.

What would make more sense, IMHO is to outsource this task and have informational blogs built on the domains and interconnect them, they are 10 years old.

Not knowing the CPC info or traffic numbers for your niche makes it hard to help, but a site with adsense stands to make you some money if it has information that people in that niche are looking for.

They will be also sell for more money with a site on them at this point in time. Again that is my opinion.

On March 28th, 2010 at 8:06 am
Ken Stein replied:

Rebecca:

Kiitos palautteesta. The last time I tried to point the domains to a site where I could “park and profit” the company did not even respond to my email. I tried to go through Google and they had just terminated their parking program. I am now looking at best options to pursue. Also later this weekend, I will take the time to look closely at your website.

The graphic arts/printing marketplace according to my out of date figures produced about $140 billion dollars in product each year.

There was approximately $8 billion dollars in equipment sold worldwide 3 years ago.

With the current economy, these figures are probably down by 15%.

It is a large marketplace.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 8:42 am
Ceo Seo replied:

shoot me a email with a list of domains and I will see what I can come up with. I have been in the print/seo business for years and have had great success. maybe I can configure some sort of joint venture. but literally you are giving all your money to the servers now.
Tor
Ceo Seo

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:26 am
Ken Stein replied:

Hi Tor:

Check your inbox. I sent you 3 email showing domains divided by category. I look forward to your feedback.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 9:31 pm
DrScot replied:

Ken! DrScot here… Matt and I are working on a “cloning” format for WordPress blogs. You could do the same, and at least get all your domains with Content on them. Make a few bucks off of AdSense, but also use them with links to sales of printer ink, and other printing supplies at Amazon. Call me sometime. — DrScot

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:46 am
Ken Stein replied:

Hi Dr. Scot:

Pick a day that you and Matt are available for lunch. I will meet you at Panerra's on Cedar Bluff. My treat for letting me know about Market Samurai. I have barely scratched surface of what the program is capable of.

You have my email address or can reach me through EOK.

Again thanks
Ken Stein

Keyword density consideration in domain name gave me an idea. By the look of it, one who is in Washers industry should prefer domain name of topwashers.com to bestwashers.com.

Thanks for the tips on search engine optimization. Sometimes I wonder how search engines will respond to my web contents. I think you answered my question by pointing to the fact that whatever is natural and pleasing to human being is also good to the eyes of search engines.

Närhi

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:43 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

You should also consider the actual word and how it looks to the human eye. If you are looking to create a brand then you don't want an awkward word that doesn't roll off the tongue well. You also need to consider whether the second word makes up a searchable key phrase. I'm sure more people search for “best washers” over “top washers”

I love the videos, but I also see and have had great luck with multi-hyphen domains for search engine rankings (not good for branding and/or easy to remember).

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:32 pm
Lane replied:

Chris,

I agree. I don't think it matters much if at all.

Thanks for taking the time to record and post this…

One thing I'd like to request though, for those who are pressed for time, and for those on less than highspeed internet; a few text bullet points on what the answers were to the questions.

Be Well!
ECS Dave

In your experience is the keyword in the domain name, more or less important as the domain age?
Thank You for all the training videos and post.

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:59 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

Depends on other factors – which I will discuss in future videos

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Lane replied:

Let me take an educated stab at this. There are many factors involved in this.

If it's a non competitive niche, maybe like a local one, keywords can dominate immediately and I mean as soon as the site is indexed.

If it's a very competitive niche than domain age will probably win out initially but then as time passes having keywords, especially exact match keywords, in the domain will win out.

Since you can't change how long your competitors have had their domains you may as well get an exact match .com, .net or .org as that is eventually likely to pay off.

May be worth buying one that is aged for quicker profits and then have another site on a domain with exact match keywords that will pay off a bit later.

Tietenkin linkit ovat hyvin tärkeitä, mutta ne ovat yhtä, pitkäaikaista, tarkka haku avainsanoja ylätason verkkotunnukset (. Com,. Org. Ja. Netto) todennäköisesti selvittää sinulle parhaiten ainakin juuri toimii nyt hakukoneita. Kuten tiedämme, että voi muuttaa vaikka vaan sinun täytyy mennä, mikä toimii.

Lisäksi olin kiinnostunut tietää ostaa verkkotunnuksia puhtaasti myydä on laitonta? varsinkin jos toinen legit yritys jo omistaa ja käy kauppaa samanlainen verkkotunnus?

Olen kokenut tämän asiakkaan kanssa jo. Hän teki tarvikkeet puhelimet, joissa keskitytään Nokian niistä. Nokia ajoivat häntä juridisesti hänen verkkotunnuksen inluded sana Nokia (hän ​​näytti aggressiivisia oikeudellinen kirjeen Nokia).

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 15:38
Carl vastasi:

Et koskaan mennä toimialueet ovat tuotenimiä siinä. esim.. Nokia, Coke, McDonalds jne. heidän täytyy pitää se yleinen. esim.. mobileaccessories.com tai mitä tahansa ja Kenny ehdottaa järkeä sekä saada hyviä liikennettä siihen.

Am innolla anwer johonkin virkaa edellä arvosta avainsanat on lisätty aliverkkotunnuksia ulkopuolella avainsana verkkotunnus. Ei-avainsana verkkotunnus laimentaa tehokkuutta koko verkkotunnusta, mutta olen silti selvittää, jos lisätty avainsana aliverkkotunnus tuo lisäarvoa.

Jokainen, jolla on kokemusta tästä?
muuttamisesta

Tämä oli hyvä video! Mutta se ei edelleenkään kerro minulle paljon että en tiedä.

Toivoin saada ideoita siitä sinun pitäisi etsiä avaimen word.com tai mykeyword.com ensin. Mikä parempaa, viiva tai etuliite / pääte? Mikä parempaa, menossa .net / .org, tai etsivät toimialue viiva tai etuliite / pääte.

Tarkoitan, kuvannut kaikki eri reiteille voimme mennä, mutta et kerro meille, kumpi meidän pitäisi valita, jos tärkein ei ole käytettävissä.

Kuten aina, yksinkertainen "yleinen yksimielisyys" tai "henkilökohtainen kokemus" vastaus on arvostettua.

Jälleen kiitos suuri videot!

27. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 15:42
Carl vastasi:

Ajatukseni tasan ..!

Hei Kenny Goodman & Brent on voimakas vinkkejä ympäri avainsanoja verkkotunnuksia.

Olen vielä kysymys päätteitä kuten + s + es.

Mitä mieltä olet tästä itse?

Ystävällisin terveisin,
Vitaly

27. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 6:54 am
Kenny Goodman vastasi:

Jos et saa tarkan ottelun sanoisin + s on yleensä seuraavaksi paras asia, koska se on yleensä seuraavaksi suurimmalle tai suurin avainsanan muutenkin. + S paljon tapauksia saa enemmän hakuja, mutta riippuu avainsanan.

28. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 2:55 am
Vitali Makarkin vastasi:

Hienoa! Tein samalla minun ensimmäinen (toivottavasti oikea valita) ja 30dc markkinarako.

Joitakin kuukausi sitten (ennen olen valinnut tämän verkkotunnuksen nimi), luen http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/helping-computers-understand-language.html

"Perinteisesti olemme lihavoitu synonyymejä kuten johtuvat vaihtoehdot - kuten sana" kuva "for haku sanalla" kuvia. '"

Onko se kuulostaa verkkotunnusta + s + t voivat kilpailijani sijoitu korkeammalle toimialue "single" merkitys? Tietenkin samalla SEO edistämisen taktiikkaa.

Two great videos, pretty much confirmed my thoughts on the matter. I wonder if you have any general views or information on the usage on subdomains when creating networks of sites?

ie primarykeyword.secondarykeyword.com

vs

secondarykeyword.primarykeyword.com

vs

primarykeyword.branding.com

help with 2 ?s. Per Kenny's video, is it okay to have a dash in the domain. ie. http://www.hire-car.com instead of http://www.hirecar.com .

Also, if I found a 10 year old domain, that had basically no links and had been asleep, then blogged on it for 6 months, would it be a lot better than if I used a newly registered domain?

Any help with these 2 ?s would be great, or sites to go to.

Kiitos!

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Carl replied:

David,

Brent wrote on domain age yesterday so you might want to read about that.

do look at Kenny Goodman blog ;very interesting

I'm also interested in thoughts on the use of subdomains.

Tämä on hyvä tieto. Se todella näyttää Google on korostamalla enemmän verkkotunnus. Mitä tehdä sen jälkeen. Com otetaan ollut polttava kysymys minulle. Kiitos!

Kiitos tämä suuri kertaus merkityksestä verkkotunnuksia.

Hei, minulla on tapana välttää tavuviivoja missä voin ja olin hyvin yllättynyt, jos kaksinkertainen (triple!) yhdysmerkit ei alennettava melko nopeasti Googlen olevan "rikastua nopeasti / spammy-sivustot .

Olen vilpittömästi suositella vapaata http://www.bustaname.com sivuston löytää avainsanoilla rikas aloilla (Minulla ei ole mitään yhteyttä siihen, vain löytää se erittäin hyödyllinen) - sen avulla voit lisätä avainsanoja, on "tavutettavien 'verkkotunnukset tai ei, valitse laajennukset ja myös valita kuinka monta avainsanat haluamasi yhdistelmä.

Huilunsoittoa opettaja ja säveltäjä (ja asiakas minun, haluavat myydä työnsä online-tilassa) hiljattain "gobsmacked" löytää http://www.FlutePlay.com käytettävissä tällä työkalulla ja kysyi, voiko hän ostaa sitä - mitä luulette sanoin vastaukseksi?

Siellä olet vielä hyviä nimiä siellä! Ajattele ulkopuolella ruutuun ja käytä työkalua, kuten Market Samurai

Thanks for the very well informed video!
Do you have any information on purchasing banned Domain names by Google?

Should that be taking into consideration?

Thanks for the valuable info.

does the order of the key word matter eg, I am selling track shoes and I want the domain runfast.com which is not available but fastrun.com is available. They obviously MEAN different things, but how would google look at that ?

On March 28th, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Jason Muir replied:

Hi Maggie,
Have you considered another Domain name?…

Broad match search for 'Run Fast' = 165,000 searches/month.

I think this is why you want the term 'Run Fast'….

Remember, Kenny mentioned Broad match as 'Keyword' + 'a different word' + 'Keyword'.com (or .org, .etc..)

When you do an exact match on 'Run Fast', it is searched only 2400 times per month. However, 'How to Run Fast' is searched nearly twice this amount-4400 times per month.

So I think 'How To Run Fast' may be worth considering? That domain name actually indicates that you have the answers for their slow running problem as well!

howtorunfast.com is taken, but howtorunfast.org & .net are still available.

Hope this helps Maggie…Jason.

thanks for the videos. These are good. the hyphen debate has been raging for years. I agree with your point of view. Kiitos tiedoista.

Great videos and information. One thing not mentioned is that Google does not recognize the hyphen in an URL, but will treat it as a space, which is good for the keyword, but not for searches remembering the exact spelling of a site name…most searchers will not remember to type in the hyphen when searching, but will just type in the words without the hyphen and therefore many times be sent to one of your competitors who has a URL without the hyphen.

If off-page SEO is done enough and correctly, then your page with a hyphenated URL will get some visitors because they are clicking on the link(with the hyphen), and not having to remember to type it in with a hyphen.

We all want the one word .com's, but using a 2 word keyword URL is not all that bad either. Onnea

thanks for the useful post! I would always avoid hyphens and extension other than .com

Excellent video guys, thanks very much for this helpful information. I do appreciate the blog and video series that you have produced. Jatkakaa hienoa työtä.

Mike Andrew

Thanks, and in particular the use of prefix vs suffix. It would seem to me that the suffix better if it fits, allowing the keyword to appear first, and not a long suffix either, as the keyword density appears to be important. That's the first I had heard of or considered such. Very good. Thanks again. I appreciate the inside, technical info, rather than just fluff.

Great – the second video answers a lot of my questions – thank you.

Hei

Interesting videos, thanks! I'm looking forward to subsequent ones. My experience with having double hyphens in domains is that (apart from Bing) Google hardly ranks “www.key–word.com” or “www.domain–name.org”

RP
Lontoo

What about length of domain name. Obviously as it gets longer it gets harder to remember or direct type in but does it hold greater value if it has direct match?

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:05 pm
Lane replied:

If you want your traffic from search engines it has far greater value. If you are using it for branding it's probably useless.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:11 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

This is something Kenny touched on briefly above in the comments

http://www.noblesamurai.com/blog/domains/domain-name-seo-1324#comment-4511

I'm glad to have watched the videos, but I really didn't learn anything….meaning that everything he talked about just reinforced what I already knew from my own experiences of working online…

So which one is better for SEO:

http://www.keyword.net -or- http://www.thekeyword.com

For example:
http://www.dogtrainingguide.net -or-
http://www.thedogtrainingguide.com

(I ask because the .com for my keyword is already taken)

Kiitos!

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm
Lane replied:

Without a doubt http://www.keyword.net and I'd choose dog-training-guide. net or ,org over http://www.thedogtrainingguide.com

On March 27th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Peter replied:

What about…
these hypens (at .com) VS. no hyphens (but at .net/org)

http://www.dog-trainingguide.com/ vs.
http://www.dogtraining-guide.com/ vs.
http://www.dog-training-guide.com/ vs.
http://www.dogtrainingguide.net or .org?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:18 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Check out Kenny's reply here:
http://www.noblesamurai.com/blog/domains/domain-name-seo-1324#comment-4494
Kenny answers another similar question to your keyword.net question here (Lance is on the money with his answer!)

Re: Hyphens – if it's me, I tend to avoid hyphens. I can't think of a time when there's ever *not* been a better non-hyphenated option available.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:30 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

eg if the keyword is “dog training” (as above) – there are a lot of other words that might be able to be added to “dog training” to get a great domain…

dog training tips, best dog training, advanced dog training, natural dog training, etc

…and no doubt some similar keywords in the market that you can target too – where you might be able to get a better quality domain for a similar (potentially not quite as high-traffic) keyword…

dog obedience training, puppy training courses, etc

Toivottavasti tämä auttaa.

On March 28th, 2010 at 2:32 am
Lane replied:

A lot does depend on your keyword and traffic research.

If I found “dog training guide” had lots of searches and low competition than I wouldn't hesitate to go for dogtrainingguide.net or any of the hyphenated domains you suggest above.

For me I prefer http://www.dog-training-guide .(com, net or org) to the other hyphenated domains as it looks better to people and is a bit easier to remember. As I mentioned I haven't had a problem with hyphenated domains (even with more than one hyphen) ranking at all.

I guess I could be wrong here and maybe it's better to go with one hyphen but nothing has convinced me that's true yet.

Even in Kenny's video he doesn't offer any proof and only says it's what he's heard. (I'm not challenging or putting Kenny down in any way by that comment. I appreciate the information and the work you done in making the videos for us.)

I've also HEARD this from many other very reputable people too but they've always presented it as what they've heard or a hunch or maybe even just a recommendation to be on the safe side. No one has offered any proof of this. (I know many times with SEO what is said has a basis based on experience even though it was never really tested to get the proof.)

I wonder if we are all worried, or maybe even getting superstitious, about Google (and the others) not liking hyphens when they really may just totally ignore them. I mean they ignore punctuation when displaying search results. (This deserves to be tested.)

OK, I'm wrong, but only by a hair. I just did a search on 'dog training guide' and 'dog-training-guide'. All the top 10 listings are the same.

The only difference is that 8th & 9th listings on the results page were switched.

Also with 'dog-training-guide' Google added an 11th listing that was video results at the bottom of the page.

Also the number of results went from 17,900,000 to 17,000,000 when I added the hyphens.

The results were pretty much the same as to the top 10 results when I did the same two searches in quotes.

I tried this with a few other search terms. It seems to hold true with the few I did except when Google perceives I want to buy something and then they throw in a shopping results in the 3rd or 4th spot, above the fold. That is a lesson with it's own repercussions on it's own.

Now as Brent says, if I found that “dog training tips”, “best dog training”, “advanced dog training”, “natural dog training” had as good or close to the traffic to competition ratio (high search volume – low competition) as “dog training guide” and the http://www.exactkeyword.com of one of those was available I'd certainly go with that too. And as he says I think you are quite likely to find another one that is as good or even better when you take into consideration his suggestion about finding similar keywords in the market maybe like puppy training.

All that having been said if I thought the volume to competition ratio was best on “dog training guide” I still wouldn't hesitate to go with that and use even a number of hyphens.

The more I think about this though this conversation from one angle is a bit idiotic because the real power of this whole technique is to and build them out and not worry about it.

You'll without doubt make 5 times as much money with 5 domains as you will with one, of course that will be relative to the traffic volume to competition ratio of each domain. Obviously you must choose wisely.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Michael -- MBA Interview replied:

This question touches upon the whole idea of “stop words” — little words such as “the”, “for”, etc. that Google supposedly ignores. So, supposedly, thekeyword.com should rank as well as keyword.com… yet the advice here seems to be otherwise.

Any comments?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Michael -- MBA Interview replied:

A separate question to Lane re your idea about building out websites with similar domain names — how would you do this? Clone your site 5 times? Or do 301 redirects?

Thank you for sharing, guys.
Yes, those rules are highly utilized by top performing affiliates of our network.
What I would be interested to hear your take on is words versus numeric symbols in the domain name (if the added word doesn't create optimized phrase but makes the domain too long).
For example:
let's say GetLaid.com is taken
so, instead of registering GetLaidAnyTime.com (long) it can be getlaid101.com or GetLaid1st.com LOL

How do search engine evaluate it?

s

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:33 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

I like words because there are some neat benefits you can get from extending a keyword with another (usually related) word.

I have quite a few websites that i have done and the worst performing one is a .net

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Lane replied:

What are the others?

Brilliant! The lightbulb went off in my head – inspired!!

This is the first time that you have produced content that is terrible !

His country specific domain advise was ” they can be quite good ”

Wow how amazingly insightful.

There are so many elements to this single thread about country specific domains that you just whitewashed over including the fact that owning a country specific domain will lock you into a country registry, you don't want a .com.au if you have aspirations of growing outside your box.

You will struggle to rank a .co.nz domain in Australia or a .co.uk in the USA but you will get a huge leg up in that country !

This is a domaineer doing nothing more than promoting .coms – I love .coms they are by far away the best domain extension for dozens of reasons but the idea of most people buying a 100% keyword match to a good volume keyword/s is LONG gone, hence the interest in so what do next ?

I would rather a 100% keyword matched alternative than a 4 broad match .com every day of the week.

Terrible post gentlemen, I hope you go back to your regular standards and loose this so called expert ….

On March 27th, 2010 at 1:29 pm
Victor replied:

I wanted add something to my comment, I realized if I am going to slam this content I need to finish my remarks and provide value myself.

If you are looking to create a business in only one country and NEVER NEVER plan to expand that business outside of the one country you should always choose a country specific domain.

With all else being equal a .com.au will outrank a .com because of the bias that Google gives country specific domains. Just make sure you understand that you are painting a box that you can never breakout of the bias runs the other way if your talking about getting a country specfic domain to show up in another country.

Both solutions have merit it is up to you to choose the right scenario for you.

That said, this post all started with Market Samurai talking about the bias of exact match domains which I completely agree with the thread has transformed in phrase match domain names and even broad match these are not the same and dont have the bias first commented on by Market Samurai.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:08 am
Donal replied:

It might be worth considering that there is only so much scope of what to cover in a few short videos. As far as I can tell, no one is claiming that these videos are covering every angle, but rather beginning to reveal some of the opportunities (for those who weren't previously aware they existed) and considerations you might want to take into account when choosing domain names.

Kenny makes the point that if your niche is country specific ccTLDs are a great option – there are considerations with SEO, brand-ability, trademarks etc.

The whole 'domain issue' is a potential can of worms, because there are so many considerations. For Kenny (or Brent) to bust that open with out consideration for the beginner (many users of market Samurai would be considered beginners) would be foolish and would only generate overwhelm and confusion, not to mention more unhelpful comments like your original one.

Clearly there is a bigger picture here and pieces of the puzzle are being revealed in bite sizes to make them digestible. You might not have learned anything (yet) but that doesn't make this “terrible” content – just read the vast majority of the comments.

You clearly have some knowledge/experience in this area, but there's a lot of people that don't and maybe, just maybe they are the target audience here… just saying.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:56 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Victor – you are SO SO SO right with what you say about Country Specific domain names.

If someone is looking to target a specific country, it will give them a ranking boost… But it will limit their ability to rank in other countries.

(If people are reading these comments, and want some more advanced content, have a look at what Victor says about ccTLDs)

Sadly, Donal's also got a point – Country-Specific SEO and Domain Names could be a whole second series of blog posts and videos by itself.

Even though Kenny touched on it briefly by saying that he would only consider ccTLDs if someone's business is only limited to a single country, I don't think any 10-minute video is really going to do that topic justice. And before we can get to those sort of advanced topics, we need to cover the basics to make sure everyone's up to speed on the fundamentals of domain name SEO.

Criticism taken on board though – and maybe we can get Kenny to agree to cover this topic for us in another set of videos.

Anyway – again – if people are reading through the comments, make sure you take a look at what Victor says about .com.au's (etc).

Victor – in the mean-time, (until we have some more advanced content on country-specific domain optimization,) do you want to help bring people up to speed, and help answer any questions people have around this here?

On March 28th, 2010 at 1:38 am
Victor replied:

Sure thank you for the opportunity to add something to the conversation.

I am happy to write a more detailed post on the subject if you like but in the short term this is a slightly expanded view on Country Specific Domains and SEO biasing.

1, Google maintains a lot of different data centers around the world ( best estimation is more than 50 ) as such the SERP results are different in every country and often they are even different from different locations in the same country ( particularly the US where they have at least 20 separate data centers.

So SERP results are different from Australia to the USA and from the UK to NZ – this is not only true for google.com.au but also if you are using google.com and are located in Australia.

2, As Google's objective is to provide the best most relevant search results to its users it places significant bias weighting on a local domain in a local data centre after all if I am in Australia there is a good probability I want to see results biased to that country.

You can also increase local bias by having a local address of registration on your domain, ie if you own a .com but your registered address is Australia you get pushed in the Australian data centre. This might not seem like a big deal but if you live in Thailand like I do and make my living in the US data centres it matters a lot, I don't care about local data centre and don't want to be biased there so I need to correct that bias in other ways.

A third bias is felt by including a local address in contact details in the content of your website however the greatest bias is to have a local country extension.

A great working example of this is the original thread that starting this conversation, try searching for “credit cards” at google.com.au and you will see all the heavy weight com's are gone and they are replaced by predominately .co.au's that have no where near the SEO Authority but they are biased to appear in the SERP's anyway.

BTW the advanced search functionality button on the right hand side of the google.com search box allows you to explore how the SERP's change from one country data center to another.

So the basic rule is if you only ever intend to operate in your local market buy the local extension they will beat a global generic domain hands down but be warned getting a local extension to play in an alternative data centre is a loosing battle so choose wisely with an eye on the future.

PS as an aside a lot is made of duplicate content, duplicate content is “per data center” so you can have basically totally duplicate content on several sites in several data centres getting the local bias in each and not be penalized.

A good example of this are Bruce Clay Sites ( no I am not connected in anyway its just an observation ) they have identical content on dozens of country specific domains designed to leverage exactly this phenomenon ie get a leg up the local SERP's

Since we are talking about US and Australia check out http://www.bruceclay.com/ and http://www.bruceclay.com.au/ they are identical but separate sites, they have the same for at least 6 countries and they are not duplicate content.

Its a lot of work and definitely not for beginners but its an interesting observation of the country specific bias being used in the real world.

Great video and very concise, also good to hear Keenys view on .com.net.org. I have always been taught that this was the hierarchal order for purchasing domains. I also liked the fact that if we are selling into a local market to have the .au, .uk appended to the domain. I have noticed that there are a number of domains now having the suffix .tv attached to the domain keyword. Where does this rank in order of preference?
Thanks again for the videos, I believe buying MS was one of my best purchases online. Jatkakaa hyvää työtä.

Really great stuff as always. I can always count on MS to deliver. Kiitos.

Olisiko Kenny voisi antaa painotus eri vaihtoehtoja. eli. Jos KW.com ei ollut saatavilla, olisiko parempi mennä tavuviiva, prefiksi / suffiksi tai muu TLD? Ja missä järjestyksessä?

28. maaliskuuta 2010 klo 12:43 am
Brent Hodgson vastasi:

Halusin vain mainita muutamia kommentteja tästä yläpuolella, jossa Kenny n vastasi ja sanoi, että hän suosii keyword.org yli keywordsuffix.com tai prefixkeyword.com.

Vuonna video, hän mainitsee hän pitää. Com yli. Org,. Org yli. Net.

Toivottavasti tämä auttaa

28. maaliskuuta 2010 kello 2:42 am
Victor vastasi:

Olen pahoillani siitä niin paljon sanottavaa tätä säiettä, mutta se on todella tärkeä aihe, ja niin väärin, että tämä on loistava tilaisuus selvittää monia harhaluuloja asiasta.

Google on ohjelma, joka esityslista on tarjota käyttäjilleen parhaan hakuun mahdollisen kokemuksen.

Siksi se on missä se on tänään, jokainen keho tietää että ne ei keksinyt haku he vain tehneet sen toimimaan paremmin. Muistan, kun he käynnistivät syystä he kiinni mieli osuus johtuu käärme on ne esittänyt jossa paljon uskottavampi kuin yksikään kilpailija kerrallaan.

Se oli heidän "pätevyys prosessi", jotka tekivät käärme uskottavalla ja yli viimeiset 10 vuotta hän on työskennellyt jatkuvasti parantamaan tätä prosessia pyritään parantamaan standardin jokaisen käärme niihin liittyy.

Jokainen tekijä, joka menee tähän "peruspätevyysmenettelyyn" on skaalautuva miljoonien ja miljoonien sivustojen.

Jokainen tekijä, joka menee tähän "peruspätevyysmenettelyyn" johdetaan matemaattisesti, joka on ainoa keino se voi skaalata niin se tekee.

Jokainen tekijä, että tiedämme olla tosiasioihin seo on voitava selittää selkeästi ja loogisesti -

esim.

At kaikkein yksinkertainen taso määrää ja laatua käänteisiä sivuston on vaikuttaa sen valvonnassa tutkinnon prosessissa.

tai verkkotunnus, on ollut säännöllistä kehitystä ajan useita vuosia annetaan bias päälle uusi tuoreeltaan lyöty sivusto.

or a country specific domain is given bias over a domain from another country in a local datacentre.

or a 100% exact match between the users search and a domain URL is a good logical indicator of the “intent” of a domains content

All of these factors make perfect logical and mathematical sense.

However the idea that a .com or a .net or a .org is given preference just “because its a .com” holds no logic or basis in programming and there are no qualification factors that Google would possibly value that you “earn” by owing one of these domains over another.

I accept that some people have seen better or worse results between the various global TLD's but the reason is not in the TLD itself it is less obvious logic.

You guys are programmers like me, I know you understand all the biases mentioned above and why they exist as qualifiers, there are so many factors that could serve as potential qualifiers that have more logic than this argument, heck how long the domain was registered for has more merit in this discussion than if it was a .net or .org.

Register for 1 year and you look like your a fly by night “red flag possible spammer” but 5 years is a commitment – forget that – that is not my point just that thinking that you get advantage between three possible extensions at the point of registration is wishful thinking.

By all means buy a .com because it will increase in value quicker than any other extension or there is a larger resale market or for the type in traffic just don't buy it because other TLD's are penalised or rewarded by Google somehow just because they are not .com's or .net's or .org's

When it comes to global generic domains it is what comes before the dot that biases SEO and for very logical practial reasons, when the domain name matches the users search string perfectly Googles logic says maybe that domain needs to go into the short list for further qualification and consideration.

Thanks for providing this kind of information. But I can't watch the video on web in my area. Would you mind to provide a download link of it? THX

newbie here found good info. I have a few domains I have just sitting around parked just because at one time or another I thought I would do something with them.

I also have a site I put up about 2 years ago with wordpress direct and is now averaging 100 visitors a day and I haven't touched it since may 09. Its a topic I know nothing about (put it up for my son) and now I have no idea how to make money from it.

Told you I am a complete newbie just off doing random stuff.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:46 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

If it were me, I'd put up a few WPD sites on those parked domains (like you did with your son's site), and just sit on them.

I have a few dozen domains doing this right now, and most of them are now ranking on the front page of Google for their keywords – without actually doing anything to them for 6, 12, 18 months.

Re: making money off the site – check out Market Samurai's monetization module. It helps you to put advertising, or product offers on your site to monetize it.

Maybe a good subject to intensify in a further post would the part with the international domain names. I find it important that a German version of a website should have an international domain name like at, de, or ch for that matter. It is far more effective to recreate the whole website on a different server with an appropriate country relevant domain name, than to have a multi-lingual website. The whole internet marketing gets easier because you can link each article to each other using text links. This will primarily cost a bit more because you make and pay for two sites instead of one but it will ultimately pay off over time.

Like others have posted a more detailed infograph regarding rankings of extensions would be great. Also the rental seems interesting to learn more about if at all possible.

What is the concensus on registering multiple domains for one website and parking them? Does the main domain name that the hosting was set up under gain the most value? And how much value do the other parked domain names really add to a website? Surely Google would figure out that somebody's collecing domains and therefore doesn't value them as much?

Very good information, Kenny
I have a question regarding the suffixes.
It's a good decision to add a suffix letter,
if the keyword.com is already taken?
Example. http://www.exactkeywordX.com?

Nopea kysymys:

Lets say I do own domain name washers.com but I do not rank well for buywashers.com

After watching this video it makes sense to register buywashers.com

Now…

1) Should I do a 301 redirect on buywashers.com to washers.com

tai

2) Should I add some content to buywashers.com optimized with that keyword and send traffic to washers.com

Probably #2 but would like to know your point of view.

Kiitos!

Kiitos videon. Would using a number be better than using a suffix. ie dogtrainingnow or dogtraining1 ?

Nice easy to understand videos Kenny. Kiitos.

I think the statistics are harder.

In non competitive niches, the low hanging fruit goes to keyword rich domain names. I've seen all sorts of phrase match with modifiers for affiliate offers, rank well and constantly in the top 10.

I also see many niches where CONTENT ranks above a keyword rich domain which does not have content.

I also personally think that BRAND and easy memorable domains are more important to “people” who are the ones who “spend”, not Google.

So I think your money page is sensible and your keyword traffic sniffers could be as keyword rich as you can get, without looking spammy.

But it certainly seems that the early bird gets the worm.
The EXACT match domain owner with great content, should win the prime position. Assuming of course backlinks and so on…

I'm curious, has anyone seen a BAD SPELLING doman with LONG TERM ranking?

Nice one colonel sanders
Peter

On March 28th, 2010 at 5:39 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Agreed that it's important to make sure you have the fundamentals (good content, links, etc). As I mentioned in a comment above, a good domain name will magnify these things – but it doesn't replace the need for content and links.

“I'm curious, has anyone seen a BAD SPELLING doman with LONG TERM ranking?”

No.

I used to have a domain that targeted a misspelling [bussiness instead of business] – but Google has closed most of those loopholes a long time ago – and I would have been better off focussing on a long term strategy for delivering value rather than trying to exploit an arbitrage opportunity.

This blog post confirms that what I'm doing is partially correct

Kiitos!

Thank you guys for this video.
It explains very well the process for choosing an appropiate domain name for SEO.
I have just recommended the video on my site on web search engine optimization

Hi my question is about the keywords included in the domains.
For example buysomething.com, net,org etc are tooken, how would be best for the search engines: somethingbuy.com or something-buy.com

Thank you for the great article Kenny.

Not wanting necessarily to rain on everyone's parade but there is something else to consider here ( and yes,I'm playing Devil's Advocate!)

How about the day comes when Google decides that Key Phrases in content and Meta Titles are more important than KWP Search terms in the Domain Name ( which we are all, for the most part, focusing on here).

ie Google decides that 'buybluewidgetsonline.com' should not necessarily get 'bonus' points for having the search term in the domain url?

Google, after all, continually state that they want to present their searchers with the most relevant content right? Just because a KWP is in the domain name doesn't necessarily mean the content is relevant to the search.

Let's face it every IM person is trying to find Keyword rich domain names!

Think of all those Squidoo lenses and Wordpress.com sites etc. etc all fighting to get the KWP in the domain name to promote that latest IM offering. How hard ( or easy) would it be for Google to simply take that out of their ranking equation?

See what I'm saying here?

We've all got a bit complacent on this particular SEO factor I think and our SEO bubbles could be burst at any time if that's all we focus on.

Hmmm… How many of us would get seriously 'F%@^£d' should that ever happen ( and don't tell it me it might not!)

Sorry to bring some 'doom and gloom' to this excellent thread but it had to be said

Clive X

That's a good point Clive.

It would be foolish to only look at the domain name when optimizing.
I myself use the domain name, title, description and header tags to get my kws in as much as possible.
It's not always possible but every bit helps.

Hei kaverit,

With regard to suffixes to the exact domain name, what effect would a number at the end have to it's ranking/indexing chances in that niche?

Would love to know.

Keep up the good work

Paul H

Interesting stuff! Keep the info Coming

Hei kaverit,
Wow, great videos and I think I have learned almost as much from the follow up comments as the videos. Please keep it coming!
First a heads up for Victor, who said(March 27th at 6:23pm)
“These are the question we are looking for anyone that is a Market samurai customer has probably been doing this for at least a little while and is past “a .com is best” “then a .net” “or maybe .org” – great advise 10 years ago, can we have some real world advise for real world sites.”
I guess 2 years is “a little while”, at least I think so. The problem is that there are a lot of people and sites that are not clear, or just plain wrong in the advice they give. After having spent good money on bad advice, ( I own 2 totally useless domains and 2 marginal at best domains) the 10 year old advice you refer to, will keep me from repeating the same mistakes in a new way. Thank You Market Samurai!!!
Now my questions. My domain name only has a 44% keyword density, would adding a “/keyword” after the “.com” help my SEO efforts? Should leave off the part of the keyword that comes before the “.com” or not?
I have recently purchased Market Samurai, and truly wish I had found it sooner!

Hei,

great video! still confuse about which one is better?
ex : dogtraining.net or dog-training.com

Kiitos

Hei

I'm intrigued with the idea of keyword density in domain names, as well as the belief that the SEs read from left to right.

SO, if I want a domain name about “bicycle parts”, and I can't get bicycleparts.com, how smart an idea is it to get bicyclepartss.com? It has very high KWD and the required keyphrase is at the start of the domain name.

Kiitos