Kumb on parimad. Com,. Net,. Info. Org. Mulle. Juures?
Nüüd ma useing. Info, sest see vaid $ 1 aastas.

27. märtsil 2010 kell 04:35 am
Brent Hodgson vastas:

Kenny läheb läbi. Com,. Org. Net,. Info ja. Biz on 1. video, ja puudutab ccTLD (kuigi mitte eriti. Mind ja. Us) ja nende parima kasutusviisi kohta 2. video.

Tasub teise ilme.

27. märtsil 2010 kell 15:49
Lane vastas:

Oleksin huvitatud oma mõtteid. Meile

27. märtsil 2010 kell 06:30 am
Bob Stephenson vastas:

. Info on hea kasutada kui te ei kavatse teha rohkem kui $ 1 aastas selle saidi ...

27. märtsil 2010 kell 08:36 am
Paul B vastas:

Ma armastan smart ass kommentaarid niimoodi. Üks minu. Info domeene teeb üle 10k kuus tütarettevõtte müügist kõik orgaanilisi liiklust. . Tv teeb rohkem päevas kui see, mida enamik inimesi (ka online markkinoijat) teha kuus.

SEO domeeninimede Google on sama lihtne kui saad nad DETAIL täpselt, mida nad teevad ja ei meeldi.

27. märtsil 2010 kell 03:25
Lane vastas:

Paul,

Kus nad detail see siis?

Aitäh.

Sõidurada

27. märtsil 2010 kell 10:09 am
Vincent vastas:

Mitte tingimata.
Mul on. Info domeeni, mis on saavutanud Google PR4 ja top loetelust oma märksõnade ja müüb $ 9 toote tavalise müügiga.

27. märtsil 2010 kell 11:18 am
Bob Stephenson vastas:

(Kumb on parimad. Com,. Net,. Info. Org. Mulle. Juures?
Nüüd ma useing. Info, sest see vaid $ 1 aastas.)

Mõned selgitust ja vabandust ... Ma ei lase alla. Info saitidele. Loomulikult saavad nad head raha nagu teised laiendid. Ma ütlesin, ja ei kavatse solvata, et kui märksõna on väärt läheb pärast, siis ärge muretsege kokkuhoid vahel. Com või. Info. (Kui. Com on olemas)

Täname selgineb minu küsimus. Net ja. Org. Ma pole kunagi päris saanud nii palju detail teemast.

Minu kogemus. Org täidab parem SEO kui. Net. See võib olla põhjus, miks meil on mitusada neid ja müüa nagu hotcakes.

Suurepärase ülevaate. Sooviksin kuulda teie mõtteid osta, ehitada, müües domeeninimed. Eriti mõned näited. On see võimalik?

27. märtsil 2010 kell 04:37 am
Brent Hodgson vastas:

Stay tuned - Kenny teada tootnud sisu nagu mees põlema. Me näeme, kui palju saame välja järgmise paari päeva jooksul - aga kui me ei pane mõned küsimused ajaliste piirangute tõttu, peaksime küsima Kenny tagasi hiljem uuesti?

27. märtsil 2010 kell 05:11 am
MauFournier vastas:

Jah, palun!

27. märtsil 2010 kell 07:38 am
Gary Dean vastas:

JAH! kõigi vahenditega! Aga me ei taha Kenny hakkama tegutsema nagu järjekordne "guru" ...
Hoidke 'em tulemas ..
Hoidke 'em lihtne ...
ja viibimise tagasihoidlik ...

27. märtsil 2010 kell 09:19 am
Viviane vastas:

Brent, muudkui Kenny oma MS koopasse siis võite taaselustada teda alati, kui meil on küsimus. Vähemalt ei saa katkestas teda lahti kuni ta paljastab kõike renoveerimiseks domeenid & müük või veel parem liisingu neid ...

27. märtsil 2010 kell 10:03 am
Obikodi vastas:

Päris kindlasti

Üks asi, mida ma sooviks, et kaetud on tegelik järjekorras omandamiseks kõige SEO optimeeritud domeeninimi.

Näiteks - parim domeeninimede järjestuses:

1 - keyword.com
2 - keywordsuffix.com
3 - märksõna suffix.com
4 - keyword.org
5 - märksõna suffix.org
6 - prefix-keyword.com

ja jne jne

Nimekirjad, nagu need saab kindlasti teha vahet, kui konkureeriva online täna, sest see annab meile tõhusa otsetee tulemusi me kõik taga ajavad - just nagu oma tarkvara!

Ja tänapäeva turul väike ja kiire lööki suur ja aeglane.

Aitäh nii hea artikkel! Ma leidsin selle väga informatiivne ja kasulik

Thank you guys so much! I have really been wondering what extensions are best if you can not get the .com for your keyword. I do have a question though. If you are able to get keyword.org or keywordonline.com which should you go for? Does the extension or the keyword density have more pull in Google?

Thanks again for this awesome post!

On March 27th, 2010 at 5:07 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

If all other factors are the same and for SEO reasons only – I would go for the .org all day long

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:33 am
Quincy | anger management classes replied:

Good question Lucas.

From my research, in the example that you give, you're better off getting the keyword.org over the keywordonline.com

I've seen countless exact phrase .net's and .org's ranking on the first page, over a phrase match .com

With that said, choosing a phrase matched .com, .net, or .org, will do better than an exact phrased .biz, .info, .me, etc.

These are from my own experiences, plus observations when conducting keyword research.

On March 31st, 2010 at 4:01 am
Victory Blog Designs | Lucas replied:

Thank You Quincy

Awesome info here – looking forward to the next installments.
Cheers.

Fantastic! Over the years, I've watched the numerous debates over the questions posed. Regarding the previous SEO post, I do believe it is entirely true. I built a website that was an exact match for a keyword that had competition from many authority sites but not much exact match competition.

I then installed wordpress on it, and left it alone for two weeks (without doing anything – I didn't even add any new posts). After I was indexed, I got to the first page of google! No backlinks, no content. Sniping keywords that you think will be searched in a future and getting the .com right off the bat is a good way to go.

I've also had better experiences with .org's over .net's, but I tend to keep researching until a .com is available.

Great information for beginners and experts alike. Thanks guys! You always provide quality information.

I use subdomains all the time for adwords to gain a better quality score.
What are your thoughts on subdomains as pertains to ranking for SEO

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:30 pm
Lane replied:

Is it working well for you or not?

What if, the dot com domain name comprises of 4 or 5 words and yet the domain is the exact keyword being searched for? Is there any disadvantage of having a long domain name for 18 to 25 words? I have found quite a few keywords where that domain is available with reasonable traffic and low competition.

Great videos Kenny BTW! Looking forward to seeing more.

Peter
Altrincham
Cheshire UK

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:34 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

If you are targeting that exact long tail key phrase then this would be the perfect domain.

Kenny:

Thank you for the information. It makes me feel as if the light at the end of the tunnel is not the train coming from the other direction.
I own 250 +/- generic .com domains focused on the graphic arts/printing industry. They relate specifically to the machinery and supplies-consumable materials that are used in the printing industry.

I have had these for up to 10 years. When possible I purchased the singular/plural and non hyphenated/hyphenated version of the domain.

I have never been able to generate any interest by anyone in my industry in buying a domain-domains, leasing a domain-domains, or working with us to develop a domain-domains for their own use.

They are undeveloped and are simply parked where the domain registrar is reaping some benefit from having ads on the “parked domain pages”

I would welcome any thoughts, suggestions, feedback from you are your viewers.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 7:45 am
Ray replied:

Ken!!!
Get thos domains and slap them up with wordpress – put up 100 words with info about what they are going to be and give them a name in the header. install the right plugins and put up the adsense so that you can earn the money!!! Dont' give it away to the hosting company. If you need help with how to then email me
onlinemarketingx at g mail dot com
What a waste – and ten years! I hear ya man… that would be getting me down…

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:35 am
Ken Stein replied:

Ray:

Thank you for the response.

The way my registrar (domainguru.net) is set up, I could not use Wordpress to put minimal content on the domains. I would need to use their basic free of cost web development software. Somehow when I tried this a few years ago, their software and my computer fought. Their software won and would lock up my computer. I am not computer savvy, so I just dropped it.

I could move the domains to where I currently have my functional web site hosted (www.graphic-equipment.com) but to have them host 200 + domains suddenly adds $100's of dollars a month to my cash outlay.

The only web development software that I have any clue about, and need to relearn, is Front Page 2003.

I have considered attempting to learn Joomla. They have a classified ads program that would be perfect for use on a number of websites that I want to develop to help dealers/equipment owners to market a specific manufacturer/type of product. These sites would be optimized for the products using the best SEO techniques.

Again Thanks
Ken Stein

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:42 am
Rick replied:

Ken,

You can install Wordpress via Fantistico from most Control Panels in my experience, very easily. As stated before filling with minimal content to get the traffic for yourself rather than allowing the hosting company to profit. I certainly am not a webmaster but found Fantastico very simple to use coupled with Filezilla for FTP.

On March 30th, 2010 at 10:17 am
Ray replied:

Ken, as I said, please email me as I would not post the info here. You are making your life waaaay too complicated mate! Kiir

On March 27th, 2010 at 8:11 am
Rebecca from ModernMarketer replied:

Ken,

Why don't you park them somewhere that YOU make money, like SEDO or Parked.com or some place. You are free to park your domains and make money from them.

What would make more sense, IMHO is to outsource this task and have informational blogs built on the domains and interconnect them, they are 10 years old.

Not knowing the CPC info or traffic numbers for your niche makes it hard to help, but a site with adsense stands to make you some money if it has information that people in that niche are looking for.

They will be also sell for more money with a site on them at this point in time. Again that is my opinion.

On March 28th, 2010 at 8:06 am
Ken Stein replied:

Rebecca:

Thank you for the feedback. The last time I tried to point the domains to a site where I could “park and profit” the company did not even respond to my email. I tried to go through Google and they had just terminated their parking program. I am now looking at best options to pursue. Also later this weekend, I will take the time to look closely at your website.

The graphic arts/printing marketplace according to my out of date figures produced about $140 billion dollars in product each year.

There was approximately $8 billion dollars in equipment sold worldwide 3 years ago.

With the current economy, these figures are probably down by 15%.

It is a large marketplace.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 8:42 am
Ceo Seo replied:

shoot me a email with a list of domains and I will see what I can come up with. I have been in the print/seo business for years and have had great success. maybe I can configure some sort of joint venture. but literally you are giving all your money to the servers now.
Tor
Ceo Seo

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:26 am
Ken Stein replied:

Hi Tor:

Check your inbox. I sent you 3 email showing domains divided by category. I look forward to your feedback.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 9:31 pm
DrScot replied:

Ken! DrScot here… Matt and I are working on a “cloning” format for WordPress blogs. You could do the same, and at least get all your domains with Content on them. Make a few bucks off of AdSense, but also use them with links to sales of printer ink, and other printing supplies at Amazon. Call me sometime. — DrScot

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:46 am
Ken Stein replied:

Hi Dr. Scot:

Vali päev, et sina ja Matt on saadaval lõunale. Ma kohtub sind Panerra 's Cedar Bluff. Minu maiuspala rendile mind teavad Market Samurai. Olen vaevalt kriimustatud pind, mida programm on võimeline.

Sa pead oma e-posti aadress või jõuavad mind läbi EOK.

Jällegi tänu
Ken Stein

Märksõna tihedus tasu domeeninime andis mulle idee. Poolt vaadata seda, kes on Washers tööstus peaks eelistama domeeninimi topwashers.com et bestwashers.com.

Täname näpunäiteid otsingumootori optimeerimine. Vahel ma ei tea, kuidas otsingumootorid vastata minu veebi sisu. Ma arvan, et te ei vastanud minu küsimusele, viidates sellele, et kõik, mis on loomulik ja meeldiv inimene on ka hea silmis otsingumootorid.

Pasknäär

27. märtsil 2010 kell 06:43 am
Kenny Goodman vastas:

Peaksite kaaluma ka tegelikult sõna ja kuidas tundub, et inimese silm. Kui otsite luua brändi, siis ei taha kohmakas sõna, mis ei ole maha sõita keele hästi. Samuti peate kaaluma, kas teine ​​sõna moodustab otsitavaks märksõnaks. Olen kindel, et rohkem inimesi otsivad "parimat pesurid" üle "top pesurid"

Ma armastan videod, kuid ma ka näha, ja on olnud suur õnn koos multi-sidekriips domeenid otsingumootori paremusjärjestusest (ole hea branding ja / või lihtne meeles pidada).

27. märtsil 2010 kell 15:32
Lane vastas:

Chris,

Ma olen nõus. Ma ei usu, see on tähtis palju kui üldse.

Täname, et leidsite aega, et registreerida ja postitada selle ...

Üks asi, mida ma tahaksin küsida küll, neile, kes on vähe aega, ja need on vähem kui high speed internet, vähe teksti täppjaotise mida vastused olid küsimustele.

Hästi!
ECS Dave

Oma kogemus on märksõna domeeninimi, rohkem või vähem tähtis kui domeeni vanus?
Aitäh kõikidele koolituse videod ja post.

27. märtsil 2010 kell 06:59 am
Kenny Goodman vastas:

Sõltub muudest teguritest - mis ma arutab tulevikus videod

27. märtsil 2010 kell 15:48
Lane vastas:

Lubage mul haritud stab seda. On palju tegureid selles.

Kui see ei ole konkurentsivõimeline nišš, ehk nagu kohalik 1, märksõnade ei domineeriks kohe ja ma mõtlen kohe, kui sait on indekseeritud.

Kui see on väga konkurentsivõimelise niši kui domeeni vanus ilmselt võita out esialgu vaid siis kui aeg möödub, mille märksõnad eriti täpset vastet märksõnu domeeni võidavad.

Kuna sa ei saa muuta, kui kaua teie konkurendid olnud oma domeenid võite samuti saada täpset vastet. Com,. Net või. Org sest see on lõpuks tõenäoliselt ära tasuma.

Võib-olla tasub osta üks, mis on laagerdunud kiiremini kasumit ja siis on veel üks sait domeeni täpset vastet märksõnad, mis tasub end veidi hiljem.

Muidugi lingid on väga oluline, kuid need on võrdsed, pikaajaline, täpset vastet märksõnu tippdomeenidele (. Com,. Org. &. Neto) on tõenäoline, et töötada välja parimad teile vähemalt see, mida töötab nüüd on otsingumootorid. Nagu me teame, et saab muuta küll aga sa pead minema, mis töötab.

Samuti oli huvitav teada, kas osta domeeninimede üksnes müüa on ebaseaduslik? eriti kui teine ​​legit firma juba omab ja kaupleb sarnase domeeninime?

Kogesin seda Client juba. Ta tegi lisaseadmed telefonid, keskendudes Nokia ones. Nokia jätkata teda juriidiliselt tema domeeninimi inluded sõna Nokia (ta näitas mulle agressiivne juriidiline kiri Nokia).

27. märtsil 2010 kell 03:38
Carl vastas:

Sa ei lähe domeene, mis on brändi nimed ta. nt. Nokia, koks, McDonalds jne, mida nad vajavad, et hoida see üldine. nt. mobileaccessories.com või mis iganes ja Kenny soovitab mõtet samuti saaksin hea liiklus ta.

Ootan anwer ühte postitust eespool väärtus märksõnad on lisatud alamdomeene mitte märksõna domeeninimi. Mitte märksõna domeeninimi lahjendada tõhusust kogu domeeninime, kuid ma olen ikka aru saada, kui lisada märksõna alamdomeeni lisab väärtust.

Kõik, kellel on kogemusi selles?
osas

See oli suur video! Aga see veel ei ütle mulle palju, et ma ei tea.

Ma lootsin, et saada ideid selle kohta, kas siis peaks otsima key-word.com või mykeyword.com 1.. Mis on parem, kriips või prefiks / sufiks? Mis on parem, lähen net / org või otsin domeeni kriips või prefiks / sufiks.

Ma mõtlen, et sa kirjeldasid kõik teistmoodi saame minna, aga te ei ütle meile, milline neist peaksime valima kui peamine 1 ei ole kättesaadav.

Nagu alati, on lihtne "üksmeelselt" või "isikliku kogemuse" Vastus on väga hinnatud.

Jällegi, aitäh suure videod!

27. märtsil 2010 kell 03:42
Carl vastas:

Minu mõtted täpselt ..!

Tere Kenny Goodman & Brent jaoks võimas näpunäiteid ümber märksõnu domeeni nime.

Mul on veel küsimus sufiksid nagu + s või + es.

Mis sa arvad sellest ones?

Parimate soovidega,
Vitali

27. märtsil 2010 kell 06:54 am
Kenny Goodman vastas:

Kui sa ei saa täpset vastet, siis ma ütleksin + s on tavaliselt järgmise parim asi, sest see on tavaliselt järgmine suurem või suurim märksõna niikuinii. + S paljudel juhtudel saab rohkem otsingud, kuid sõltub märksõna.

On 28. märts 2010 at 2:55 am
Vitali Makarkin vastas:

Suurepärane! Ma tegin sama oma esimese (loodan õigus valida), et 30dc niši.

Mõni kuu tagasi (enne valisin selle domeeni nimi), lugesin http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/helping-computers-understand-language.html

"Ajalooliselt oleme paksus kirjas sünonüümid nagu tulenevate variandid - nagu sõna" pilt "eest otsing sõnaga" pilte. ""

See tunduda domeeni + s või + es saab outrank domeeni "single" tähendust? Muidugi sama SEO edendamise taktikat.

Kaks suurt videos, päris palju kinnitas oma mõtteid selles küsimuses. Ei tea, kas teil on mingeid üldisi seisukohti ja teavet kasutust alamdomeene luues võrgustikke saite?

st primarykeyword.secondarykeyword.com

vs

secondarykeyword.primarykeyword.com

vs

primarykeyword.branding.com

aidata 2? s. Per Kenny video on see okei on kriips domeeni. st. http://www.hire-car.com asemel http://www.hirecar.com .

Samuti, kui sain 10 aastat vana domeen, mis oli põhimõtteliselt ei lingid ja oli magama jäänud, siis blogged on see 6 kuud, see oleks palju parem kui siis, kui ma kasutasin äsja registreeritud domeeni?

Igasugune abi nende 2? S oleks tore, või saite minna.

Aitäh!

27. märtsil 2010 kell 15:45
Carl vastas:

David,

Brent kirjutas domeeni vanus eile, et te võiksite lugeda seda.

ei vaata Kenny Goodman blogi, väga huvitav

Ma olen ka huvitatud mõtteid kasutamise alamdomeene.

This is good information. It really looks like Google is putting more emphasis on the domain name. What to do after .com is taken has been a burning question for me. Aitäh!

Thanks for this great refresher on the importance of domain names.

Hi, I tend to avoid hyphens wherever I can and I'd be very surprised if double (triple!) hyphens won't be downgraded pretty quick by Google as being 'get rich quick/spammy' sites .

I heartily recommend the free http://www.bustaname.com site for finding keyword rich domains (I have no connection with it, just find it very useful) – it allows you to add keywords, have 'hyphenated' domains or not, choose your extensions and also choose how many keywords you want in the mix.

A flute playing teacher and composer ( and client of mine, looking to sell his work online) was recently 'gobsmacked' to find http://www.FlutePlay.com available by using this tool and asked me whether he should buy it – what do you think I said in reply?

There're still good names out there! Think outside the box and use a tool like Market Samurai

Thanks for the very well informed video!
Do you have any information on purchasing banned Domain names by Google?

Should that be taking into consideration?

Thanks for the valuable info.

does the order of the key word matter eg, I am selling track shoes and I want the domain runfast.com which is not available but fastrun.com is available. They obviously MEAN different things, but how would google look at that ?

On March 28th, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Jason Muir replied:

Hi Maggie,
Have you considered another Domain name?…

Broad match search for 'Run Fast' = 165,000 searches/month.

I think this is why you want the term 'Run Fast'….

Remember, Kenny mentioned Broad match as 'Keyword' + 'a different word' + 'Keyword'.com (or .org, .etc..)

When you do an exact match on 'Run Fast', it is searched only 2400 times per month. However, 'How to Run Fast' is searched nearly twice this amount-4400 times per month.

So I think 'How To Run Fast' may be worth considering? That domain name actually indicates that you have the answers for their slow running problem as well!

howtorunfast.com is taken, but howtorunfast.org & .net are still available.

Hope this helps Maggie…Jason.

thanks for the videos. These are good. the hyphen debate has been raging for years. I agree with your point of view. Thanks for the information.

Great videos and information. One thing not mentioned is that Google does not recognize the hyphen in an URL, but will treat it as a space, which is good for the keyword, but not for searches remembering the exact spelling of a site name…most searchers will not remember to type in the hyphen when searching, but will just type in the words without the hyphen and therefore many times be sent to one of your competitors who has a URL without the hyphen.

If off-page SEO is done enough and correctly, then your page with a hyphenated URL will get some visitors because they are clicking on the link(with the hyphen), and not having to remember to type it in with a hyphen.

We all want the one word .com's, but using a 2 word keyword URL is not all that bad either. Õnne

thanks for the useful post! I would always avoid hyphens and extension other than .com

Excellent video guys, thanks very much for this helpful information. I do appreciate the blog and video series that you have produced. Keep up the great work.

Mike Andrew

Thanks, and in particular the use of prefix vs suffix. It would seem to me that the suffix better if it fits, allowing the keyword to appear first, and not a long suffix either, as the keyword density appears to be important. That's the first I had heard of or considered such. Väga hea. Tänan. I appreciate the inside, technical info, rather than just fluff.

Great – the second video answers a lot of my questions – thank you.

Tere

Interesting videos, thanks! I'm looking forward to subsequent ones. My experience with having double hyphens in domains is that (apart from Bing) Google hardly ranks “www.key–word.com” or “www.domain–name.org”

RP
London

What about length of domain name. Obviously as it gets longer it gets harder to remember or direct type in but does it hold greater value if it has direct match?

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:05 pm
Lane replied:

If you want your traffic from search engines it has far greater value. If you are using it for branding it's probably useless.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:11 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

This is something Kenny touched on briefly above in the comments

http://www.noblesamurai.com/blog/domains/domain-name-seo-1324#comment-4511

I'm glad to have watched the videos, but I really didn't learn anything….meaning that everything he talked about just reinforced what I already knew from my own experiences of working online…

So which one is better for SEO:

http://www.keyword.net -or- http://www.thekeyword.com

For example:
http://www.dogtrainingguide.net -or-
http://www.thedogtrainingguide.com

(I ask because the .com for my keyword is already taken)

Aitäh!

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm
Lane replied:

Without a doubt http://www.keyword.net and I'd choose dog-training-guide. net or ,org over http://www.thedogtrainingguide.com

On March 27th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Peter replied:

What about…
these hypens (at .com) VS. no hyphens (but at .net/org)

http://www.dog-trainingguide.com/ vs.
http://www.dogtraining-guide.com/ vs.
http://www.dog-training-guide.com/ vs.
http://www.dogtrainingguide.net or .org?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:18 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Check out Kenny's reply here:
http://www.noblesamurai.com/blog/domains/domain-name-seo-1324#comment-4494
Kenny answers another similar question to your keyword.net question here (Lance is on the money with his answer!)

Re: Hyphens – if it's me, I tend to avoid hyphens. I can't think of a time when there's ever *not* been a better non-hyphenated option available.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:30 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

eg if the keyword is “dog training” (as above) – there are a lot of other words that might be able to be added to “dog training” to get a great domain…

dog training tips, best dog training, advanced dog training, natural dog training, etc

…and no doubt some similar keywords in the market that you can target too – where you might be able to get a better quality domain for a similar (potentially not quite as high-traffic) keyword…

dog obedience training, puppy training courses, etc

Loodan, et see aitab.

On March 28th, 2010 at 2:32 am
Lane replied:

A lot does depend on your keyword and traffic research.

If I found “dog training guide” had lots of searches and low competition than I wouldn't hesitate to go for dogtrainingguide.net or any of the hyphenated domains you suggest above.

For me I prefer http://www.dog-training-guide .(com, net or org) to the other hyphenated domains as it looks better to people and is a bit easier to remember. As I mentioned I haven't had a problem with hyphenated domains (even with more than one hyphen) ranking at all.

I guess I could be wrong here and maybe it's better to go with one hyphen but nothing has convinced me that's true yet.

Even in Kenny's video he doesn't offer any proof and only says it's what he's heard. (I'm not challenging or putting Kenny down in any way by that comment. I appreciate the information and the work you done in making the videos for us.)

I've also HEARD this from many other very reputable people too but they've always presented it as what they've heard or a hunch or maybe even just a recommendation to be on the safe side. No one has offered any proof of this. (I know many times with SEO what is said has a basis based on experience even though it was never really tested to get the proof.)

I wonder if we are all worried, or maybe even getting superstitious, about Google (and the others) not liking hyphens when they really may just totally ignore them. I mean they ignore punctuation when displaying search results. (This deserves to be tested.)

OK, I'm wrong, but only by a hair. I just did a search on 'dog training guide' and 'dog-training-guide'. All the top 10 listings are the same.

The only difference is that 8th & 9th listings on the results page were switched.

Also with 'dog-training-guide' Google added an 11th listing that was video results at the bottom of the page.

Also the number of results went from 17,900,000 to 17,000,000 when I added the hyphens.

The results were pretty much the same as to the top 10 results when I did the same two searches in quotes.

I tried this with a few other search terms. It seems to hold true with the few I did except when Google perceives I want to buy something and then they throw in a shopping results in the 3rd or 4th spot, above the fold. That is a lesson with it's own repercussions on it's own.

Now as Brent says, if I found that “dog training tips”, “best dog training”, “advanced dog training”, “natural dog training” had as good or close to the traffic to competition ratio (high search volume – low competition) as “dog training guide” and the http://www.exactkeyword.com of one of those was available I'd certainly go with that too. And as he says I think you are quite likely to find another one that is as good or even better when you take into consideration his suggestion about finding similar keywords in the market maybe like puppy training.

All that having been said if I thought the volume to competition ratio was best on “dog training guide” I still wouldn't hesitate to go with that and use even a number of hyphens.

The more I think about this though this conversation from one angle is a bit idiotic because the real power of this whole technique is to and build them out and not worry about it.

You'll without doubt make 5 times as much money with 5 domains as you will with one, of course that will be relative to the traffic volume to competition ratio of each domain. Obviously you must choose wisely.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Michael -- MBA Interview replied:

This question touches upon the whole idea of “stop words” — little words such as “the”, “for”, etc. that Google supposedly ignores. So, supposedly, thekeyword.com should rank as well as keyword.com… yet the advice here seems to be otherwise.

Any comments?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Michael -- MBA Interview replied:

A separate question to Lane re your idea about building out websites with similar domain names — how would you do this? Clone your site 5 times? Or do 301 redirects?

Thank you for sharing, guys.
Yes, those rules are highly utilized by top performing affiliates of our network.
What I would be interested to hear your take on is words versus numeric symbols in the domain name (if the added word doesn't create optimized phrase but makes the domain too long).
For example:
let's say GetLaid.com is taken
so, instead of registering GetLaidAnyTime.com (long) it can be getlaid101.com or GetLaid1st.com LOL

How do search engine evaluate it?

s

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:33 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

I like words because there are some neat benefits you can get from extending a keyword with another (usually related) word.

I have quite a few websites that i have done and the worst performing one is a .net

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Lane replied:

What are the others?

Brilliant! The lightbulb went off in my head – inspired!!

This is the first time that you have produced content that is terrible !

His country specific domain advise was ” they can be quite good ”

Wow how amazingly insightful.

There are so many elements to this single thread about country specific domains that you just whitewashed over including the fact that owning a country specific domain will lock you into a country registry, you don't want a .com.au if you have aspirations of growing outside your box.

You will struggle to rank a .co.nz domain in Australia or a .co.uk in the USA but you will get a huge leg up in that country !

This is a domaineer doing nothing more than promoting .coms – I love .coms they are by far away the best domain extension for dozens of reasons but the idea of most people buying a 100% keyword match to a good volume keyword/s is LONG gone, hence the interest in so what do next ?

I would rather a 100% keyword matched alternative than a 4 broad match .com every day of the week.

Terrible post gentlemen, I hope you go back to your regular standards and loose this so called expert ….

On March 27th, 2010 at 1:29 pm
Victor replied:

I wanted add something to my comment, I realized if I am going to slam this content I need to finish my remarks and provide value myself.

If you are looking to create a business in only one country and NEVER NEVER plan to expand that business outside of the one country you should always choose a country specific domain.

With all else being equal a .com.au will outrank a .com because of the bias that Google gives country specific domains. Just make sure you understand that you are painting a box that you can never breakout of the bias runs the other way if your talking about getting a country specfic domain to show up in another country.

Both solutions have merit it is up to you to choose the right scenario for you.

That said, this post all started with Market Samurai talking about the bias of exact match domains which I completely agree with the thread has transformed in phrase match domain names and even broad match these are not the same and dont have the bias first commented on by Market Samurai.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:08 am
Donal replied:

It might be worth considering that there is only so much scope of what to cover in a few short videos. As far as I can tell, no one is claiming that these videos are covering every angle, but rather beginning to reveal some of the opportunities (for those who weren't previously aware they existed) and considerations you might want to take into account when choosing domain names.

Kenny makes the point that if your niche is country specific ccTLDs are a great option – there are considerations with SEO, brand-ability, trademarks etc.

The whole 'domain issue' is a potential can of worms, because there are so many considerations. For Kenny (or Brent) to bust that open with out consideration for the beginner (many users of market Samurai would be considered beginners) would be foolish and would only generate overwhelm and confusion, not to mention more unhelpful comments like your original one.

Clearly there is a bigger picture here and pieces of the puzzle are being revealed in bite sizes to make them digestible. You might not have learned anything (yet) but that doesn't make this “terrible” content – just read the vast majority of the comments.

You clearly have some knowledge/experience in this area, but there's a lot of people that don't and maybe, just maybe they are the target audience here… just saying.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:56 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Victor – you are SO SO SO right with what you say about Country Specific domain names.

If someone is looking to target a specific country, it will give them a ranking boost… But it will limit their ability to rank in other countries.

(If people are reading these comments, and want some more advanced content, have a look at what Victor says about ccTLDs)

Sadly, Donal's also got a point – Country-Specific SEO and Domain Names could be a whole second series of blog posts and videos by itself.

Even though Kenny touched on it briefly by saying that he would only consider ccTLDs if someone's business is only limited to a single country, I don't think any 10-minute video is really going to do that topic justice. And before we can get to those sort of advanced topics, we need to cover the basics to make sure everyone's up to speed on the fundamentals of domain name SEO.

Criticism taken on board though – and maybe we can get Kenny to agree to cover this topic for us in another set of videos.

Anyway – again – if people are reading through the comments, make sure you take a look at what Victor says about .com.au's (etc).

Victor – in the mean-time, (until we have some more advanced content on country-specific domain optimization,) do you want to help bring people up to speed, and help answer any questions people have around this here?

On March 28th, 2010 at 1:38 am
Victor replied:

Sure thank you for the opportunity to add something to the conversation.

I am happy to write a more detailed post on the subject if you like but in the short term this is a slightly expanded view on Country Specific Domains and SEO biasing.

1, Google maintains a lot of different data centers around the world ( best estimation is more than 50 ) as such the SERP results are different in every country and often they are even different from different locations in the same country ( particularly the US where they have at least 20 separate data centers.

So SERP results are different from Australia to the USA and from the UK to NZ – this is not only true for google.com.au but also if you are using google.com and are located in Australia.

2, As Google's objective is to provide the best most relevant search results to its users it places significant bias weighting on a local domain in a local data centre after all if I am in Australia there is a good probability I want to see results biased to that country.

You can also increase local bias by having a local address of registration on your domain, ie if you own a .com but your registered address is Australia you get pushed in the Australian data centre. This might not seem like a big deal but if you live in Thailand like I do and make my living in the US data centres it matters a lot, I don't care about local data centre and don't want to be biased there so I need to correct that bias in other ways.

A third bias is felt by including a local address in contact details in the content of your website however the greatest bias is to have a local country extension.

A great working example of this is the original thread that starting this conversation, try searching for “credit cards” at google.com.au and you will see all the heavy weight com's are gone and they are replaced by predominately .co.au's that have no where near the SEO Authority but they are biased to appear in the SERP's anyway.

BTW the advanced search functionality button on the right hand side of the google.com search box allows you to explore how the SERP's change from one country data center to another.

So the basic rule is if you only ever intend to operate in your local market buy the local extension they will beat a global generic domain hands down but be warned getting a local extension to play in an alternative data centre is a loosing battle so choose wisely with an eye on the future.

PS as an aside a lot is made of duplicate content, duplicate content is “per data center” so you can have basically totally duplicate content on several sites in several data centres getting the local bias in each and not be penalized.

A good example of this are Bruce Clay Sites ( no I am not connected in anyway its just an observation ) they have identical content on dozens of country specific domains designed to leverage exactly this phenomenon ie get a leg up the local SERP's

Since we are talking about US and Australia check out http://www.bruceclay.com/ and http://www.bruceclay.com.au/ they are identical but separate sites, they have the same for at least 6 countries and they are not duplicate content.

Its a lot of work and definitely not for beginners but its an interesting observation of the country specific bias being used in the real world.

Great video and very concise, also good to hear Keenys view on .com.net.org. I have always been taught that this was the hierarchal order for purchasing domains. I also liked the fact that if we are selling into a local market to have the .au, .uk appended to the domain. I have noticed that there are a number of domains now having the suffix .tv attached to the domain keyword. Where does this rank in order of preference?
Thanks again for the videos, I believe buying MS was one of my best purchases online. Hoia head tööd.

Really great stuff as always. I can always count on MS to deliver. Aitäh.

Kas Kenny oleks võimalik anda kaalu erinevaid valikuid. st. kui KW.com ei olnud, see oleks parem minna sidekriipsuga, prefiks / sufiks või muu TLD? Ja mis järjekorras?

On 28. märts 2010 at 0:43 am
Brent Hodgson vastas:

Lihtsalt tahtsin mainida, on mõned kommentaarid selle üle, kus Kenny tema vastas ja ütles, et ta eelistab keyword.org üle keywordsuffix.com või prefixkeyword.com.

Aastal video, ta mainib ta eelistab. Com üle. Org. Org üle. Net.

Loodan, et see aitab

On 28. märts 2010 at 2:42 am
Victor vastas:

Vabandust, et nii palju öelda on see teema, kuid see on tõesti oluline teema ja nii valesti, et see on suurepärane võimalus selgitada paljudele ümbritsevad müüdid selle teema kohta.

Google on päevakorras, et päevakorras on pakkuda oma kasutajatele parim otsing kogemus võimalik.

Seetõttu on koht, kus ta täna on, iga keha teab, et nad ei leiutanud otsingu nad just seda tööd paremini. Mäletan, kui nad käivitanud põhjusel nad kinni pidada osa sellepärast, et SERP tema nad esitas kus palju usutavam kui teised konkurent ajal.

See oli nende "kvalifikatsiooni protsess", mis tegi oma SERP oma usaldusväärne ja viimase 10 aasta jooksul nad on töötanud pidevalt parandada seda protsessi püütakse parandada standard iga SERP nad esitavad.

Iga tegur, mis läheb see "kvalifikatsiooni protsess" tuleb skaalautuvia üle miljonite saitidele.

Iga tegur, mis läheb see "kvalifikatsiooni protsess" on matemaatiliselt tuletatud, et ainus viis seda skaleerida, kuidas ta teeb.

Iga tegur, et me teame olevat faktilist SEO suudab seletada selgelt ja loogiliselt -

nt

Kõige lihtsal tasemel koguse ja kvaliteedi lingid saidil on mõjutab tema asutus kvalifikatsiooni protsess.

või domeeni, mis on olnud regulaarne arengu jooksul mitu aastat on antud diagonaal üle uue värskelt vermitud kohas.

või konkreetse riigi domeeni antakse diagonaal üle domeeni teise riigi kohaliku andmekeskusi.

või 100% täpses kasutajad otsivad ja domeeni URL on hea loogiline näitaja "tahtlus" ja domeenid sisu

Kõik need tegurid muudavad täiuslik loogiline ja matemaatiline mõttes.

Kuid idee, et. Com või. Net või. Org on eelistada lihtsalt "sest tema. Com" omab mingit loogikat või alus programmeerimine ja puuduvad kvalifikatsioon tegureid, et Google oleks võimalik väärtus, et sa "teenida" poolt kuna üks neist domeene üle teise.

Olen nõus, et mõned inimesed on näinud parem või halvem tulemusi erinevate maailma TLD kuid põhjus pole TLD ise on vähem selge loogika.

Te olete programmeerijad, nagu mind, ma tean, et sa aru kõik peensusi eespool ja miks nad on olemas, kuna täpsustus, seal on nii palju tegureid, mis võiksid olla võimalikud täpsustus, et olla rohkem loogikat kui see argument, kuradit, kui kaua domeen on registreeritud on rohkem teeneid selles arutelus, kui see oli. net või. org.

Registreeru 1 aasta ja sa näed välja nagu sinu fly by night "punase lipu võimalik rämpsposti", kuid 5 aasta jooksul on kohustus - unustada, et - see pole minu just seda mõtlesin, et sa ära vahele 3 võimalikud pikendamised kohas registreerimine on wishful thinking.

Kõigi vahenditega osta. Com sest see suurendab väärtus kiiremini kui ükski teine ​​laiendus või on suurem Edasimüügiturg või tüübi liikluses lihtsalt ei osta, sest muud TLD-d on karistatud või tunnustada Google kuidagi lihtsalt sellepärast, et nad ei ole. com-või. neto-või. org s

Kui tegemist on globaalse geneeriliste domeenide see mis tuleb enne dot et peensusi SEO ja väga loogiline praktiliseks põhjustel, kui domeeninimi vastab kasutajate otsisõna täiesti Googles loogika ütleb äkki, et domeen peab minema lühike nimekiri täiendavat kvalifikatsiooni ja lugupidamine.

Täname pakkudes seda laadi teavet. Aga ma ei saa vaadata video web minu ala. Kas sa pahanda pakkuda download link on? THX

newbie here found good info. I have a few domains I have just sitting around parked just because at one time or another I thought I would do something with them.

I also have a site I put up about 2 years ago with wordpress direct and is now averaging 100 visitors a day and I haven't touched it since may 09. Its a topic I know nothing about (put it up for my son) and now I have no idea how to make money from it.

Told you I am a complete newbie just off doing random stuff.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:46 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

If it were me, I'd put up a few WPD sites on those parked domains (like you did with your son's site), and just sit on them.

I have a few dozen domains doing this right now, and most of them are now ranking on the front page of Google for their keywords – without actually doing anything to them for 6, 12, 18 months.

Re: making money off the site – check out Market Samurai's monetization module. It helps you to put advertising, or product offers on your site to monetize it.

Maybe a good subject to intensify in a further post would the part with the international domain names. I find it important that a German version of a website should have an international domain name like at, de, or ch for that matter. It is far more effective to recreate the whole website on a different server with an appropriate country relevant domain name, than to have a multi-lingual website. The whole internet marketing gets easier because you can link each article to each other using text links. This will primarily cost a bit more because you make and pay for two sites instead of one but it will ultimately pay off over time.

Like others have posted a more detailed infograph regarding rankings of extensions would be great. Also the rental seems interesting to learn more about if at all possible.

What is the concensus on registering multiple domains for one website and parking them? Does the main domain name that the hosting was set up under gain the most value? And how much value do the other parked domain names really add to a website? Surely Google would figure out that somebody's collecing domains and therefore doesn't value them as much?

Very good information, Kenny
I have a question regarding the suffixes.
It's a good decision to add a suffix letter,
if the keyword.com is already taken?
Example. http://www.exactkeywordX.com?

Quick question:

Lets say I do own domain name washers.com but I do not rank well for buywashers.com

After watching this video it makes sense to register buywashers.com

Now…

1) Should I do a 301 redirect on buywashers.com to washers.com

or

2) Should I add some content to buywashers.com optimized with that keyword and send traffic to washers.com

Probably #2 but would like to know your point of view.

Aitäh!

Thanks for the video. Would using a number be better than using a suffix. ie dogtrainingnow or dogtraining1 ?

Nice easy to understand videos Kenny. Aitäh.

I think the statistics are harder.

In non competitive niches, the low hanging fruit goes to keyword rich domain names. I've seen all sorts of phrase match with modifiers for affiliate offers, rank well and constantly in the top 10.

I also see many niches where CONTENT ranks above a keyword rich domain which does not have content.

I also personally think that BRAND and easy memorable domains are more important to “people” who are the ones who “spend”, not Google.

So I think your money page is sensible and your keyword traffic sniffers could be as keyword rich as you can get, without looking spammy.

But it certainly seems that the early bird gets the worm.
The EXACT match domain owner with great content, should win the prime position. Assuming of course backlinks and so on…

I'm curious, has anyone seen a BAD SPELLING doman with LONG TERM ranking?

Nice one colonel sanders
Peter

On March 28th, 2010 at 5:39 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Agreed that it's important to make sure you have the fundamentals (good content, links, etc). As I mentioned in a comment above, a good domain name will magnify these things – but it doesn't replace the need for content and links.

“I'm curious, has anyone seen a BAD SPELLING doman with LONG TERM ranking?”

Ei.

I used to have a domain that targeted a misspelling [bussiness instead of business] – but Google has closed most of those loopholes a long time ago – and I would have been better off focussing on a long term strategy for delivering value rather than trying to exploit an arbitrage opportunity.

This blog post confirms that what I'm doing is partially correct

Thanks!

Thank you guys for this video.
It explains very well the process for choosing an appropiate domain name for SEO.
I have just recommended the video on my site on web search engine optimization

Hi my question is about the keywords included in the domains.
For example buysomething.com, net,org etc are tooken, how would be best for the search engines: somethingbuy.com or something-buy.com

Thank you for the great article Kenny.

Not wanting necessarily to rain on everyone's parade but there is something else to consider here ( and yes,I'm playing Devil's Advocate!)

How about the day comes when Google decides that Key Phrases in content and Meta Titles are more important than KWP Search terms in the Domain Name ( which we are all, for the most part, focusing on here).

ie Google decides that 'buybluewidgetsonline.com' should not necessarily get 'bonus' points for having the search term in the domain url?

Google, after all, continually state that they want to present their searchers with the most relevant content right? Just because a KWP is in the domain name doesn't necessarily mean the content is relevant to the search.

Let's face it every IM person is trying to find Keyword rich domain names!

Think of all those Squidoo lenses and Wordpress.com sites etc. etc all fighting to get the KWP in the domain name to promote that latest IM offering. How hard ( or easy) would it be for Google to simply take that out of their ranking equation?

See what I'm saying here?

We've all got a bit complacent on this particular SEO factor I think and our SEO bubbles could be burst at any time if that's all we focus on.

Hmmm… How many of us would get seriously 'F%@^£d' should that ever happen ( and don't tell it me it might not!)

Sorry to bring some 'doom and gloom' to this excellent thread but it had to be said

Clive X

That's a good point Clive.

It would be foolish to only look at the domain name when optimizing.
I myself use the domain name, title, description and header tags to get my kws in as much as possible.
It's not always possible but every bit helps.

Hi guys,

With regard to suffixes to the exact domain name, what effect would a number at the end have to it's ranking/indexing chances in that niche?

Would love to know.

Keep up the good work

Paul H

Interesting stuff! Keep the info Coming

Hi guys,
Wow, great videos and I think I have learned almost as much from the follow up comments as the videos. Please keep it coming!
First a heads up for Victor, who said(March 27th at 6:23pm)
“These are the question we are looking for anyone that is a Market samurai customer has probably been doing this for at least a little while and is past “a .com is best” “then a .net” “or maybe .org” – great advise 10 years ago, can we have some real world advise for real world sites.”
I guess 2 years is “a little while”, at least I think so. The problem is that there are a lot of people and sites that are not clear, or just plain wrong in the advice they give. After having spent good money on bad advice, ( I own 2 totally useless domains and 2 marginal at best domains) the 10 year old advice you refer to, will keep me from repeating the same mistakes in a new way. Thank You Market Samurai!!!
Now my questions. My domain name only has a 44% keyword density, would adding a “/keyword” after the “.com” help my SEO efforts? Should leave off the part of the keyword that comes before the “.com” or not?
I have recently purchased Market Samurai, and truly wish I had found it sooner!

Hi,

great video! still confuse about which one is better?
ex : dogtraining.net or dog-training.com

Tänan

Tere

Olen intrigeeritud mõttega märksõna tihedus domeeninimed, nagu ka usk, et SEde lugeda vasakult paremale.

Niisiis, kui ma tahan domeeni kohta "jalgrattaosade" ja ma ei saa bicycleparts.com, kuidas nutikas mõte on see, et saada bicyclepartss.com? See on väga suur KWD ja vajalik keyphrase on alguses domeeninimi.

Tänan