واحد الذي هو أفضل من. com،. الصافية،. معلومات،. ORG،. لي. لنا؟
الآن أنا useing. معلومات لأنه فقط 1 دولار لكل عام.

في 27 مارس 2010 في 4:35 صباحا
برنت هودجسون فأجاب:

كيني يمر. com،. ORG،. الصافية،. معلومات وبيز. في الفيديو 1، واللمسات على رموز البلدان (وإن لم يكن على وجه التحديد. لي ولنا.)، واستخدام أفضل ما لديهم في شريط الفيديو 2.

انها تستحق نظرة ثانية.

في 27 مارس 2010 في 15:49
حارة أجاب:

وأود أن تكون مهتمة في أفكاره حول. لنا

في 27 مارس 2010 في الساعة 6:30 صباحا
بوب ستيفنسون فأجاب:

ومعلومات. على ما يرام لاستخدام إذا كنت لا تخطط لجعل أكثر من 1 دولار في العام على هذا الموقع ...

في 27 مارس 2010 في 8:36 صباحا
بول باء فأجاب:

أنا أحب تعليق الحمار الذكية من هذا القبيل. واحد من المجالات لي معلومات. يجعل أكثر من 10K في الشهر في مبيعات كل فرع من حركة المرور العضوية. جهاز تلفزيون. يجعل أكثر في يوم واحد من ما معظم الناس (بما في ذلك التسويق عبر الانترنت) جعل في غضون شهر.

كبار المسئولين الاقتصاديين في أسماء النطاقات مع جوجل هو بهذه البساطة التي يمكنك الحصول عليها، هم من التفصيل بالضبط ما يفعلونه، ولا يحبون.

في 27 مارس 2010 في 15:25
حارة أجاب:

بول،

أين هم من التفصيل هذا من فضلك؟

شكرا.

ممر

في 27 مارس 2010 في 10:09 صباحا
فنسنت فأجاب:

ليس بالضرورة.
لدي المجال. المعلومات التي حققت جوجل PR4 وقائمة أعلى لمدة الكلمة الرئيسية لها، وتبيع منتج $ 9 مع مبيعات العادية.

في 27 مارس 2010 الساعة 11:18 صباحا
بوب ستيفنسون فأجاب:

(الذي هو واحد من أفضل. com،. الصافية،. معلومات،. ORG،. لي. لنا؟
الآن أنا useing. معلومات لأنه فقط 1 دولار لكل عام.)

بعض توضيح واعتذار ... لم أكن اخماد. مواقع معلومات. بالطبع فإنها يمكن أن تجعل المال جيدة مثل غيرها من التمديدات. كنت أقول، وليس نية لاهانة، انه اذا كانت الكلمة الرئيسية يستحق الذهاب بعد، ثم لا تقلق بشأن تحقيق وفورات بين COM. أو معلومات. (إذا كان COM. غير متوفرة)

شكرا لازالة سؤالي حول. الصافية وORG. لم يسبق لي ان حصلت على هذا تماما الكثير من التفاصيل حول هذا الموضوع.

في تجربتي، و. ORG أداء أفضل لكبار المسئولين الاقتصاديين من. صافي. التي قد تكون السبب لدينا عدة مئات منهم وبيعها مثل hotcakes.

نظرة عامة ممتازة. أود أن أسمع رأيك في شراء وبناء وبيع أسماء النطاقات. خصوصا مع بعض الأمثلة. هل هذا ممكن؟

في 27 مارس 2010 في 4:37 صباحا
برنت هودجسون فأجاب:

لا تنزعج - لقد تم كيني إنتاج المحتوى وكأنه رجل في النار. ونحن في طريقنا لنرى كم نحن يمكن ان تحصل على مدى الأيام القليلة القادمة - ولكن إذا كان لنا أن تفوت على بعض الأسئلة القليلة نظرا لضيق الوقت، ينبغي أن نسأل كيني مرة أخرى في وقت لاحق؟

في 27 مارس 2010 في الساعة 5:11
أجاب MauFournier:

نعم، من فضلك!

في 27 مارس 2010 في 7:38 صباحا
غاري دين أجاب:

نعم! بكل الوسائل! ولكن نحن لا نريد كيني لبدء يتصرف مثل "المعلم" بعد آخر ...
تبقي 'م القادمة ..
تبقي 'م بسيط ...
وتبقى متواضعة ...

في 27 مارس 2010 في 9:19 صباحا
أجاب فيفيان:

برنت، وتبقي فقط كيني في زنزانة MS الخاص بك حتى تتمكن بعث له كلما كان لدينا سؤال. على أقل تقدير، لا يمكنك قطع عليه فضفاض حتى يكشف كل شيء عن تجديد المجالات وبيع أو التأجير حتى الآن أفضل لهم ...

في 27 مارس 2010 الساعة 10:03 صباحا
Obikodi فأجاب:

بالتأكيد

شيء واحد أود أن أرى تغطية هو الترتيب الفعلي للأفضلية للحصول على معظم المجال الأمثل كبار المسئولين الاقتصاديين واسم.

على سبيل المثال - افضل أسماء النطاقات في النظام هي:

1 - keyword.com
2 - keywordsuffix.com
3 - الكلمات الرئيسية suffix.com
4 - keyword.org
5 - الكلمات الرئيسية suffix.org
6 - بادئة-keyword.com

الخ الخ و

يمكن للقوائم مثل هذه بالتأكيد جعل الفارق عندما تتنافس على الانترنت اليوم، لأنه يعطينا الاختصار فعالة لنتائج ونحن جميعا مطاردة - تماما مثل هذا البرنامج!

واليوم في سوق صغيرة ويدق بسرعة كبيرة وبطيئة.

Thanks for such a great article! I found it very informative and helpful

Thank you guys so much! I have really been wondering what extensions are best if you can not get the .com for your keyword. I do have a question though. If you are able to get keyword.org or keywordonline.com which should you go for? Does the extension or the keyword density have more pull in Google?

Thanks again for this awesome post!

On March 27th, 2010 at 5:07 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

If all other factors are the same and for SEO reasons only – I would go for the .org all day long

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:33 am
Quincy | anger management classes replied:

Good question Lucas.

From my research, in the example that you give, you're better off getting the keyword.org over the keywordonline.com

I've seen countless exact phrase .net's and .org's ranking on the first page, over a phrase match .com

With that said, choosing a phrase matched .com, .net, or .org, will do better than an exact phrased .biz, .info, .me, etc.

These are from my own experiences, plus observations when conducting keyword research.

On March 31st, 2010 at 4:01 am
Victory Blog Designs | Lucas replied:

Thank You Quincy

Awesome info here – looking forward to the next installments.
هتاف.

رائع! Over the years, I've watched the numerous debates over the questions posed. Regarding the previous SEO post, I do believe it is entirely true. I built a website that was an exact match for a keyword that had competition from many authority sites but not much exact match competition.

I then installed wordpress on it, and left it alone for two weeks (without doing anything – I didn't even add any new posts). After I was indexed, I got to the first page of google! No backlinks, no content. Sniping keywords that you think will be searched in a future and getting the .com right off the bat is a good way to go.

I've also had better experiences with .org's over .net's, but I tend to keep researching until a .com is available.

Great information for beginners and experts alike. شكرا لكم أيها الرجال! You always provide quality information.

I use subdomains all the time for adwords to gain a better quality score.
What are your thoughts on subdomains as pertains to ranking for SEO

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:30 pm
Lane replied:

Is it working well for you or not?

What if, the dot com domain name comprises of 4 or 5 words and yet the domain is the exact keyword being searched for? Is there any disadvantage of having a long domain name for 18 to 25 words? I have found quite a few keywords where that domain is available with reasonable traffic and low competition.

Great videos Kenny BTW! Looking forward to seeing more.

بيتر
Altrincham
Cheshire UK

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:34 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

If you are targeting that exact long tail key phrase then this would be the perfect domain.

Kenny:

أشكركم على هذه المعلومات. It makes me feel as if the light at the end of the tunnel is not the train coming from the other direction.
I own 250 +/- generic .com domains focused on the graphic arts/printing industry. They relate specifically to the machinery and supplies-consumable materials that are used in the printing industry.

I have had these for up to 10 years. When possible I purchased the singular/plural and non hyphenated/hyphenated version of the domain.

I have never been able to generate any interest by anyone in my industry in buying a domain-domains, leasing a domain-domains, or working with us to develop a domain-domains for their own use.

They are undeveloped and are simply parked where the domain registrar is reaping some benefit from having ads on the “parked domain pages”

I would welcome any thoughts, suggestions, feedback from you are your viewers.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 7:45 am
Ray replied:

Ken!!!
Get thos domains and slap them up with wordpress – put up 100 words with info about what they are going to be and give them a name in the header. install the right plugins and put up the adsense so that you can earn the money!!! Dont' give it away to the hosting company. If you need help with how to then email me
onlinemarketingx at g mail dot com
What a waste – and ten years! I hear ya man… that would be getting me down…

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:35 am
Ken Stein replied:

Ray:

Thank you for the response.

The way my registrar (domainguru.net) is set up, I could not use Wordpress to put minimal content on the domains. I would need to use their basic free of cost web development software. Somehow when I tried this a few years ago, their software and my computer fought. Their software won and would lock up my computer. I am not computer savvy, so I just dropped it.

I could move the domains to where I currently have my functional web site hosted (www.graphic-equipment.com) but to have them host 200 + domains suddenly adds $100's of dollars a month to my cash outlay.

The only web development software that I have any clue about, and need to relearn, is Front Page 2003.

I have considered attempting to learn Joomla. They have a classified ads program that would be perfect for use on a number of websites that I want to develop to help dealers/equipment owners to market a specific manufacturer/type of product. These sites would be optimized for the products using the best SEO techniques.

Again Thanks
Ken Stein

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:42 am
Rick replied:

Ken,

You can install Wordpress via Fantistico from most Control Panels in my experience, very easily. As stated before filling with minimal content to get the traffic for yourself rather than allowing the hosting company to profit. I certainly am not a webmaster but found Fantastico very simple to use coupled with Filezilla for FTP.

On March 30th, 2010 at 10:17 am
Ray replied:

Ken, as I said, please email me as I would not post the info here. You are making your life waaaay too complicated mate! شعاع

On March 27th, 2010 at 8:11 am
Rebecca from ModernMarketer replied:

Ken,

Why don't you park them somewhere that YOU make money, like SEDO or Parked.com or some place. You are free to park your domains and make money from them.

What would make more sense, IMHO is to outsource this task and have informational blogs built on the domains and interconnect them, they are 10 years old.

Not knowing the CPC info or traffic numbers for your niche makes it hard to help, but a site with adsense stands to make you some money if it has information that people in that niche are looking for.

They will be also sell for more money with a site on them at this point in time. Again that is my opinion.

On March 28th, 2010 at 8:06 am
Ken Stein replied:

Rebecca:

أشكركم على ردود الفعل. The last time I tried to point the domains to a site where I could “park and profit” the company did not even respond to my email. I tried to go through Google and they had just terminated their parking program. I am now looking at best options to pursue. Also later this weekend, I will take the time to look closely at your website.

The graphic arts/printing marketplace according to my out of date figures produced about $140 billion dollars in product each year.

There was approximately $8 billion dollars in equipment sold worldwide 3 years ago.

With the current economy, these figures are probably down by 15%.

It is a large marketplace.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 8:42 am
Ceo Seo replied:

shoot me a email with a list of domains and I will see what I can come up with. I have been in the print/seo business for years and have had great success. maybe I can configure some sort of joint venture. but literally you are giving all your money to the servers now.
Tor
Ceo Seo

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:26 am
Ken Stein replied:

Hi Tor:

Check your inbox. I sent you 3 email showing domains divided by category. I look forward to your feedback.

Ken Stein

On March 27th, 2010 at 9:31 pm
DrScot replied:

Ken! DrScot here… Matt and I are working on a “cloning” format for WordPress blogs. You could do the same, and at least get all your domains with Content on them. Make a few bucks off of AdSense, but also use them with links to sales of printer ink, and other printing supplies at Amazon. Call me sometime. — DrScot

On March 28th, 2010 at 7:46 am
Ken Stein replied:

Hi Dr. Scot:

Pick a day that you and Matt are available for lunch. I will meet you at Panerra's on Cedar Bluff. My treat for letting me know about Market Samurai. I have barely scratched surface of what the program is capable of.

You have my email address or can reach me through EOK.

Again thanks
Ken Stein

Keyword density consideration in domain name gave me an idea. By the look of it, one who is in Washers industry should prefer domain name of topwashers.com to bestwashers.com.

Thanks for the tips on search engine optimization. Sometimes I wonder how search engines will respond to my web contents. I think you answered my question by pointing to the fact that whatever is natural and pleasing to human being is also good to the eyes of search engines.

جاي

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:43 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

You should also consider the actual word and how it looks to the human eye. If you are looking to create a brand then you don't want an awkward word that doesn't roll off the tongue well. You also need to consider whether the second word makes up a searchable key phrase. I'm sure more people search for “best washers” over “top washers”

I love the videos, but I also see and have had great luck with multi-hyphen domains for search engine rankings (not good for branding and/or easy to remember).

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:32 pm
Lane replied:

Chris,

وأنا أتفق. I don't think it matters much if at all.

Thanks for taking the time to record and post this…

One thing I'd like to request though, for those who are pressed for time, and for those on less than highspeed internet; a few text bullet points on what the answers were to the questions.

Be Well!
ECS Dave

In your experience is the keyword in the domain name, more or less important as the domain age?
Thank You for all the training videos and post.

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:59 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

Depends on other factors – which I will discuss in future videos

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Lane replied:

Let me take an educated stab at this. There are many factors involved in this.

If it's a non competitive niche, maybe like a local one, keywords can dominate immediately and I mean as soon as the site is indexed.

If it's a very competitive niche than domain age will probably win out initially but then as time passes having keywords, especially exact match keywords, in the domain will win out.

Since you can't change how long your competitors have had their domains you may as well get an exact match .com, .net or .org as that is eventually likely to pay off.

May be worth buying one that is aged for quicker profits and then have another site on a domain with exact match keywords that will pay off a bit later.

Of course backlinks are very important, but those being equal, long-term, exact match keywords in the top level domains (.com, .org. & .net) are likely to work out best for you at least that is what is working now in the search engines. As we know that can change though but you have to go with what is working.

Also, I was interested to know whether purchasing domain names purely for resell is illegal? especially if another legit firm already owns & trades with a similar domain name?

I experienced this with a Client already. He made accessories for phones, focussing on Nokia ones. Nokia pursued him legally as his domain name inluded the word Nokia (he showed me the agressive legal letter from Nokia).

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:38 pm
Carl replied:

You never go for domains that have brand names in it. على سبيل المثال. Nokia, Coke, McDonalds etc they need to keep it generic. على سبيل المثال. mobileaccessories.com or whatever and as Kenny suggests make sense as well as get some good traffic to it.

Am looking forward to the anwer to one of the posts above on the value of keywords being added as subdomains to non keyword domain name. The non-keyword domain name will dilute the effectiveness of the total domain name, but i'm still to figure out if the added keyword sub-domain will add value.

Anyone with experience in this?
التحيات

This was a great video! But it still didn't tell me much that I didn't know.

I was hoping to get some ideas on whether you should look for key-word.com or mykeyword.com first. What's better, a dash or a prefix/suffix? What's better, going with .net/.org, or looking for a domain with a dash or prefix/suffix.

I mean, you DESCRIBED all the different routes we can go to, but you didn't tell us which one we should choose if the main one isn't available.

As always, a simple “general consensus” or “personal experience” answer will be much appreciated.

Again, thanks for the great videos!

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:42 pm
Carl replied:

My thoughts exactly..!!

Hello Kenny Goodman & Brent for the powerful tips around keywords in domain names.

I'm still have a question about suffixes like +s or +es.

What do you think about this ones?

مع أطيب التحيات،
Vitaly

On March 27th, 2010 at 6:54 am
Kenny Goodman replied:

If you cannot get the exact match then I would say +s is usually the next best thing because it is usually the next biggest or THE biggest keyword anyway. The +s in a lot of cases gets more searches but depends on the keyword.

On March 28th, 2010 at 2:55 am
Vitaly Makarkin replied:

Great! I did same for my first (I hope right choose) for the 30dc niche.

Some month ago (before I chose this domain name), I read http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/helping-computers-understand-language.html

“Historically, we have bolded synonyms such as stemming variants — like the word “picture” for a search with the word “pictures.”"

Does it sound like domain with +s or +es can outrank the domain in “single” meanings? Of course with a same SEO promotion tactics.

اثنين من أشرطة الفيديو كبيرة، جميلة وأكد الكثير من أفكاري في هذا الشأن. وأتساءل عما إذا كان لديك أي آراء عامة أو معلومات عن الاستخدام في المجالات الفرعية عند إنشاء شبكات من المواقع؟

أي primarykeyword.secondarykeyword.com

مباراة

secondarykeyword.primarykeyword.com

مباراة

primarykeyword.branding.com

مساعدة مع ق؟ 2. في فيديو كيني، هل هو بخير لديها شرطة في المجال. أي. http://www.hire-car.com بدلا من http://www.hirecar.com .

أيضا، إذا وجدت المجال 10 عاما، الذي كان في الأساس ليس لها صلات وكان نائما، ثم تدون على ذلك لمدة 6 أشهر، سيكون أفضل بكثير إذا كنت تستخدم النطاقات المسجلة حديثا؟

فإن أي مساعدة مع هذه 2؟ S تكون كبيرة، أو مواقع للذهاب الى.

شكرا!

في 27 مارس 2010 في الساعة 3:45
كارل فأجاب:

ديفيد،

وكتب برنت في سن نطاق أمس حتى أنك قد ترغب في قراءة حول هذا الموضوع.

لا ننظر كيني غودمان بلوق، مثيرة جدا للاهتمام

أنا مهتم أيضا أنا في الأفكار بشأن استخدام النطاقات الفرعية.

وهذا هو معلومات جيدة. يبدو حقا مثل غوغل ويضع المزيد من التركيز على اسم المجال. ما يجب القيام به بعد أخذ. com كان السؤال الملح بالنسبة لي. شكرا!

شكرا لهذا تجديد كبير على أهمية أسماء النطاقات.

مرحبا، أنا أميل إلى تجنب الواصلات حيثما استطعت وسأكون مندهشا للغاية إذا لن مزدوجة (triple!) الواصلات يتم خفض سريع جدا من قبل Google على أنها "الثراء السريع / مزعجة" مواقع .

انني اوصي بحراره الحرة http://www.bustaname.com موقع لإيجاد مجالات الكلمة الرئيسية الغنية (ليس لدي أي اتصال معها، وتجد أنه من المفيد جدا فقط) - لأنها تتيح لك إضافة كلمات رئيسية، لديهم "الواصلة" المجالات أم لا، اختيار التمديدات الخاصة بك وأيضا اختيار عدد الكلمات الرئيسية التي ترغب في هذا المزيج.

تم مؤخرا الفلوت لعب المعلم والمؤلف الموسيقي (والعميل من الألغام، وتتطلع الى بيع على الانترنت عمله) 'gobsmacked "للعثور على http://www.FlutePlay.com المتاحة عن طريق استخدام هذه الأداة وطلب مني اذا كان يجب ان شرائه - ما هل تعتقد قلت في الرد؟

كنت لا تزال هناك أسماء جيدة هناك! التفكير خارج منطقة الجزاء، واستخدام أداة مثل الساموراي السوق

شكرا للفيديو بشكل جيد للغاية وأبلغ!
هل لديكم أي معلومات عن شراء أسماء النطاقات المحظورة من قبل جوجل؟

على أنه ينبغي أن تأخذ في الاعتبار؟

شكرا للمعلومات القيمة.

لا ترتيب مثل كلمة مفتاح المسألة، وأنا على بيع الأحذية المسار، وأريد أن runfast.com المجال الذي لا يتوفر إلا fastrun.com هو متاح. من الواضح أنها تعني أشياء مختلفة، ولكن كيف سيكون جوجل النظر في ذلك؟

في، 28 مارس 2010 في الساعة 9:26
أجاب جايسون موير:

مرحبا ماجي،
هل تعتبر اسم نطاق آخر؟ ...

بحث واسع مباراة ل 'تشغيل سريع' = 165000 عمليات البحث / شهر.

وأعتقد أن هذا هو السبب في أنك تريد "تشغيل سريع" على المدى ....

تذكر، وذكر كيني مباراة واسع باسم 'كلمة' + 'مختلفة كلمة "+" الكلمة الرئيسية ". com (أو org،. الخ.)

عند الانتهاء من ذلك على تطابق تام على "تشغيل سريع"، يتم البحث فقط 2400 مرات في الشهر. ومع ذلك، 'كيفية تشغيل سريع "يتم البحث ما يقرب من ضعف هذا المبلغ، 4400 مرات في الشهر.

لذلك أعتقد أن 'كيفية تشغيل سريع "قد يكون من المفيد النظر؟ أن اسم المجال يشير في الواقع أن لديك اجابات لمشكلة بطء تشغيل بهم كذلك!

يؤخذ howtorunfast.com، لكن howtorunfast.org و. الصافية لا تزال متاحة.

آمل أن يساعد هذا ماجي ... جايسون.

شكرا على أشرطة الفيديو. هذه هي جيدة. the hyphen debate has been raging for years. I agree with your point of view. Thanks for the information.

Great videos and information. One thing not mentioned is that Google does not recognize the hyphen in an URL, but will treat it as a space, which is good for the keyword, but not for searches remembering the exact spelling of a site name…most searchers will not remember to type in the hyphen when searching, but will just type in the words without the hyphen and therefore many times be sent to one of your competitors who has a URL without the hyphen.

If off-page SEO is done enough and correctly, then your page with a hyphenated URL will get some visitors because they are clicking on the link(with the hyphen), and not having to remember to type it in with a hyphen.

We all want the one word .com's, but using a 2 word keyword URL is not all that bad either. Good luck

thanks for the useful post! I would always avoid hyphens and extension other than .com

Excellent video guys, thanks very much for this helpful information. I do appreciate the blog and video series that you have produced. Keep up the great work.

Mike Andrew

Thanks, and in particular the use of prefix vs suffix. It would seem to me that the suffix better if it fits, allowing the keyword to appear first, and not a long suffix either, as the keyword density appears to be important. That's the first I had heard of or considered such. Very good. شكرا مرة أخرى. I appreciate the inside, technical info, rather than just fluff.

Great – the second video answers a lot of my questions – thank you.

مرحبا

Interesting videos, thanks! I'm looking forward to subsequent ones. My experience with having double hyphens in domains is that (apart from Bing) Google hardly ranks “www.key–word.com” or “www.domain–name.org”

RP
لندن

What about length of domain name. Obviously as it gets longer it gets harder to remember or direct type in but does it hold greater value if it has direct match?

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:05 pm
Lane replied:

If you want your traffic from search engines it has far greater value. If you are using it for branding it's probably useless.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:11 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

This is something Kenny touched on briefly above in the comments

http://www.noblesamurai.com/blog/domains/domain-name-seo-1324#comment-4511

I'm glad to have watched the videos, but I really didn't learn anything….meaning that everything he talked about just reinforced what I already knew from my own experiences of working online…

So which one is better for SEO:

http://www.keyword.net -or- http://www.thekeyword.com

على سبيل المثال:
http://www.dogtrainingguide.net -or-
http://www.thedogtrainingguide.com

(I ask because the .com for my keyword is already taken)

شكرا!

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm
Lane replied:

Without a doubt http://www.keyword.net and I'd choose dog-training-guide. net or ,org over http://www.thedogtrainingguide.com

On March 27th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Peter replied:

What about…
these hypens (at .com) VS. no hyphens (but at .net/org)

http://www.dog-trainingguide.com/ vs.
http://www.dogtraining-guide.com/ vs.
http://www.dog-training-guide.com/ vs.
http://www.dogtrainingguide.net or .org?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:18 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Check out Kenny's reply here:
http://www.noblesamurai.com/blog/domains/domain-name-seo-1324#comment-4494
Kenny answers another similar question to your keyword.net question here (Lance is on the money with his answer!)

Re: Hyphens – if it's me, I tend to avoid hyphens. I can't think of a time when there's ever *not* been a better non-hyphenated option available.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:30 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

eg if the keyword is “dog training” (as above) – there are a lot of other words that might be able to be added to “dog training” to get a great domain…

dog training tips, best dog training, advanced dog training, natural dog training, etc

…and no doubt some similar keywords in the market that you can target too – where you might be able to get a better quality domain for a similar (potentially not quite as high-traffic) keyword…

dog obedience training, puppy training courses, etc

آمل أن يساعد هذا.

On March 28th, 2010 at 2:32 am
Lane replied:

A lot does depend on your keyword and traffic research.

If I found “dog training guide” had lots of searches and low competition than I wouldn't hesitate to go for dogtrainingguide.net or any of the hyphenated domains you suggest above.

For me I prefer http://www.dog-training-guide .(com, net or org) to the other hyphenated domains as it looks better to people and is a bit easier to remember. As I mentioned I haven't had a problem with hyphenated domains (even with more than one hyphen) ranking at all.

I guess I could be wrong here and maybe it's better to go with one hyphen but nothing has convinced me that's true yet.

Even in Kenny's video he doesn't offer any proof and only says it's what he's heard. (I'm not challenging or putting Kenny down in any way by that comment. I appreciate the information and the work you done in making the videos for us.)

I've also HEARD this from many other very reputable people too but they've always presented it as what they've heard or a hunch or maybe even just a recommendation to be on the safe side. No one has offered any proof of this. (I know many times with SEO what is said has a basis based on experience even though it was never really tested to get the proof.)

I wonder if we are all worried, or maybe even getting superstitious, about Google (and the others) not liking hyphens when they really may just totally ignore them. I mean they ignore punctuation when displaying search results. (This deserves to be tested.)

OK, I'm wrong, but only by a hair. I just did a search on 'dog training guide' and 'dog-training-guide'. All the top 10 listings are the same.

The only difference is that 8th & 9th listings on the results page were switched.

Also with 'dog-training-guide' Google added an 11th listing that was video results at the bottom of the page.

Also the number of results went from 17,900,000 to 17,000,000 when I added the hyphens.

The results were pretty much the same as to the top 10 results when I did the same two searches in quotes.

I tried this with a few other search terms. It seems to hold true with the few I did except when Google perceives I want to buy something and then they throw in a shopping results in the 3rd or 4th spot, above the fold. That is a lesson with it's own repercussions on it's own.

Now as Brent says, if I found that “dog training tips”, “best dog training”, “advanced dog training”, “natural dog training” had as good or close to the traffic to competition ratio (high search volume – low competition) as “dog training guide” and the http://www.exactkeyword.com of one of those was available I'd certainly go with that too. And as he says I think you are quite likely to find another one that is as good or even better when you take into consideration his suggestion about finding similar keywords in the market maybe like puppy training.

All that having been said if I thought the volume to competition ratio was best on “dog training guide” I still wouldn't hesitate to go with that and use even a number of hyphens.

The more I think about this though this conversation from one angle is a bit idiotic because the real power of this whole technique is to and build them out and not worry about it.

You'll without doubt make 5 times as much money with 5 domains as you will with one, of course that will be relative to the traffic volume to competition ratio of each domain. Obviously you must choose wisely.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Michael -- MBA Interview replied:

This question touches upon the whole idea of “stop words” — little words such as “the”, “for”, etc. that Google supposedly ignores. So, supposedly, thekeyword.com should rank as well as keyword.com… yet the advice here seems to be otherwise.

Any comments?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Michael -- MBA Interview replied:

A separate question to Lane re your idea about building out websites with similar domain names — how would you do this? Clone your site 5 times? Or do 301 redirects?

Thank you for sharing, guys.
Yes, those rules are highly utilized by top performing affiliates of our network.
What I would be interested to hear your take on is words versus numeric symbols in the domain name (if the added word doesn't create optimized phrase but makes the domain too long).
على سبيل المثال:
let's say GetLaid.com is taken
so, instead of registering GetLaidAnyTime.com (long) it can be getlaid101.com or GetLaid1st.com LOL

How do search engine evaluate it?

ق

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:33 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

I like words because there are some neat benefits you can get from extending a keyword with another (usually related) word.

I have quite a few websites that i have done and the worst performing one is a .net

On March 27th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Lane replied:

What are the others?

رائعة! The lightbulb went off in my head – inspired!!

This is the first time that you have produced content that is terrible !

His country specific domain advise was ” they can be quite good ”

Wow how amazingly insightful.

There are so many elements to this single thread about country specific domains that you just whitewashed over including the fact that owning a country specific domain will lock you into a country registry, you don't want a .com.au if you have aspirations of growing outside your box.

You will struggle to rank a .co.nz domain in Australia or a .co.uk in the USA but you will get a huge leg up in that country !

This is a domaineer doing nothing more than promoting .coms – I love .coms they are by far away the best domain extension for dozens of reasons but the idea of most people buying a 100% keyword match to a good volume keyword/s is LONG gone, hence the interest in so what do next ?

I would rather a 100% keyword matched alternative than a 4 broad match .com every day of the week.

Terrible post gentlemen, I hope you go back to your regular standards and loose this so called expert ….

On March 27th, 2010 at 1:29 pm
Victor replied:

I wanted add something to my comment, I realized if I am going to slam this content I need to finish my remarks and provide value myself.

If you are looking to create a business in only one country and NEVER NEVER plan to expand that business outside of the one country you should always choose a country specific domain.

With all else being equal a .com.au will outrank a .com because of the bias that Google gives country specific domains. Just make sure you understand that you are painting a box that you can never breakout of the bias runs the other way if your talking about getting a country specfic domain to show up in another country.

Both solutions have merit it is up to you to choose the right scenario for you.

That said, this post all started with Market Samurai talking about the bias of exact match domains which I completely agree with the thread has transformed in phrase match domain names and even broad match these are not the same and dont have the bias first commented on by Market Samurai.

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:08 am
Donal replied:

It might be worth considering that there is only so much scope of what to cover in a few short videos. As far as I can tell, no one is claiming that these videos are covering every angle, but rather beginning to reveal some of the opportunities (for those who weren't previously aware they existed) and considerations you might want to take into account when choosing domain names.

Kenny makes the point that if your niche is country specific ccTLDs are a great option – there are considerations with SEO, brand-ability, trademarks etc.

The whole 'domain issue' is a potential can of worms, because there are so many considerations. For Kenny (or Brent) to bust that open with out consideration for the beginner (many users of market Samurai would be considered beginners) would be foolish and would only generate overwhelm and confusion, not to mention more unhelpful comments like your original one.

Clearly there is a bigger picture here and pieces of the puzzle are being revealed in bite sizes to make them digestible. You might not have learned anything (yet) but that doesn't make this “terrible” content – just read the vast majority of the comments.

لديك بوضوح بعض المعرفة / الخبرة في هذا المجال، ولكن هناك الكثير من الناس التي لا تفعل ذلك، وربما، ربما فقط لأنهم الجمهور المستهدف ... هنا فقط أقول.

في، 28 مارس 2010 فى الساعة 12:56
برنت هودجسون فأجاب:

المنتصر - أنت لدرجة الحق في ذلك مع ما تقوله عن أسماء البلدان مجال معين.

إذا كان شخص ما يبحث في استهداف بلد معين، وسوف يعطيهم دفعة الترتيب ... ولكن هذا سوف يحد من قدرتها على رتبة في بلدان أخرى.

(إذا كان الناس يشاهدون هذه التعليقات، وتريد بعض محتوى أكثر تقدما، وإلقاء نظرة على ما يقول فيكتور حول رموز البلدان)

للأسف، ودونال حصلت على نقطة - قطرية كبار المسئولين الاقتصاديين وأسماء النطاقات يمكن أن تكون سلسلة كاملة الثاني من بلوق وظائف وأشرطة الفيديو في حد ذاته.

على الرغم من كيني لمست لفترة وجيزة على ذلك بالقول انه لن يفكر في رموز البلدان إذا اقتصر فقط عمل شخص ما في بلد واحد، لا أعتقد أن أي شريط فيديو مدته 10 دقائق يحدث في الواقع أن نفعل ذلك عدالة الموضوع. وقبل أن نتمكن من الحصول على هذه النوع من المواضيع المتقدمة، ونحن بحاجة لتغطية الاساسيات في التأكد من ان الجميع على سرعة تصل إلى أساسيات اسم النطاق جنوب شرقي أوروبا.

الانتقادات التي اتخذت على متن الطائرة على الرغم - وربما نتمكن من الحصول على كيني على الموافقة على تغطية هذا الموضوع بالنسبة لنا في مجموعة أخرى من أشرطة الفيديو.

على أي حال - مرة أخرى - إذا كان الناس يشاهدون من خلال هذه التعليقات، وتأكد من أن نلقي نظرة على ما يقوله عن فيكتور ق com.au "(الخ).

المنتصر - في الوقت نفسه، (حتى يكون لدينا بعض محتوى أكثر تقدما في بلدان محددة الأمثل للنطاق،) هل تريد أن تساعد على جلب الناس تصل إلى سرعة، وتساعد على الإجابة عن أي أسئلة الناس لديهم حول هذا هنا؟

في، 28 مارس 2010 في 1:38 صباحا
اجاب المنتصر:

أشكر متأكد أنك لإتاحة الفرصة لإضافة شيء إلى المحادثة.

أنا سعيد لكتابة آخر أكثر تفصيلا عن هذا الموضوع إذا كنت ترغب ولكن في المدى القصير وهذا هو رأي توسعت قليلا في المجالات المحددة لكل بلد ويتحامل كبار المسئولين الاقتصاديين.

1، صور يحافظ على الكثير من مراكز البيانات المختلفة حول العالم (أفضل تقدير أكثر من 50) على هذا النحو نتائج سيرب مختلفة في كل بلد، وغالبا ما تكون مختلفة حتى من مواقع مختلفة في نفس البلد (ولا سيما الولايات المتحدة، حيث لديها لا يقل عن 20 منفصلة مراكز البيانات.

لذلك نتائج سيرب مختلفة من أستراليا إلى الولايات المتحدة ومن المملكة المتحدة إلى نيوزيلندي - هذا ليس صحيحا فقط بالنسبة google.com.au ولكن أيضا إذا كنت تستخدم google.com وتقع في أستراليا.

2، وهدف جوجل هو تقديم أفضل نتائج البحث الأكثر ملاءمة لمستخدميها فإنه يضع كبير الترجيح التحيز على نطاق محلي في مركز البيانات المحلية بعد كل حال أنا في أستراليا هناك احتمال جيد وأريد أن أرى نتائج منحازة إلى ذلك البلد.

يمكنك أيضا زيادة التحيز المحلية من خلال وجود عنوان محلي من تسجيل على المجال الخاص بك، إذا كنت تملك أي COM. لكن عنوانك مسجل هو الحصول على استراليا دفعت لك في مركز البيانات الاسترالية. وهذا قد لا يبدو مثل صفقة كبيرة ولكن إذا كنت تعيش في تايلند كما أفعل، وجعل رزقي في مراكز البيانات الامريكية يهم كثيرا، وأنا لا يهمني مركز البيانات المحلية، ولا تريد أن تكون منحازة لذلك هناك ولست بحاجة لتصحيح هذا التحيز في وسائل أخرى.

ورأى انحياز الثالث بما في ذلك العنوان المحلي في تفاصيل الاتصال في محتوى موقع الويب الخاص بك ولكن أعظم التحيز هو أن يكون هناك تمديد البلاد المحلية.

وهناك مثال كبير من العمل وهذا هو الموضوع الاساسي الذي بدء هذا الحوار، في محاولة البحث عن "بطاقات الائتمان" في google.com.au وسترى كل COM الوزن الثقيل هي ذهبت وحلت محلها في الغالب. co.au الصورة التي حيث لا يكون بالقرب من هيئة كبار المسئولين الاقتصاديين ولكن هناك تحيز أنها تظهر في لسيرب على أي حال.

راجع للشغل وظيفة البحث المتقدم الموجود على الجانب الأيمن من مربع البحث google.com يسمح لك لاستكشاف كيف يمكن للسيرب في التغيير من بلد واحد مركز بيانات إلى آخر.

وبالتالي فإن القاعدة الأساسية هي إذا كنت تنوي فقط من أي وقت مضى للعمل في السوق المحلية الخاصة بك شراء تمديد المحلية التي سوف تغلب على أيدي نطاق عالمي عام لأسفل ولكنه حذر من الحصول على تمديد المحلية للعب في مركز بيانات بديل معركة فقدان حتى تختار بحكمة مع التركيز على المستقبل.

PS باعتبارها. جانبا وقدم الكثير من محتوى مكرر، محتوى مكرر هو "مركز البيانات في" ذلك يمكن أن يكون أساسا مكررة تماما محتوى على مواقع عدة في مراكز البيانات العديد من الحصول على انحياز المحلية في كل وعدم معاقبة أن

وخير مثال على ذلك هي بروس مواقع كلاي (أي أنا لا علاقة لي به على أي حال في الملاحظة مجرد) لديهم محتوى متطابقة حول عشرات من المجالات بلد محددة تهدف إلى رفع هذا بالضبط أي ظاهرة الحصول على الساق في لسيرب المحلية

منذ كنا نتحدث عن الولايات المتحدة وأستراليا تحقق من http://www.bruceclay.com/ و http://www.bruceclay.com.au/~~V أنها متطابقة ولكن مواقع منفصلة، ​​لديهم نفس ما لا يقل عن 6 دول، و فهي ليست تكرار المحتوى.

له الكثير من العمل وليس قطعا للمبتدئين ولكن لها ملاحظة مثيرة للاهتمام من انحياز بلد معين يتم استخدامه في العالم الحقيقي.

عظيم فيديو وموجزة جدا، جيد أيضا للاستماع إلى عرض عن Keenys. com.net.org. لقد كنت دائما ان يدرس هذا هو النظام الهرمي لشراء المجالات. أحببت أيضا حقيقة أننا إذا أردنا بيع في السوق المحلية لديها. الاتحاد الافريقي،. المملكة المتحدة إلحاق المجال. وقد لاحظت أن هناك عددا من المجالات وجود الآن لاحقة. التلفزيون تعلق على الكلمة المجال. أين هذه المرتبة في ترتيب الأفضلية؟
وشكرا مرة أخرى لأشرطة الفيديو، وأعتقد أن شراء مايكروسوفت واحدة من عمليات الشراء قصارى جهدي على الانترنت. استمروا في العمل الجيد.

عظيم حقا الاشياء كما هو الحال دائما. أستطيع أن تعتمد دائما على MS لتسليم. شكرا.

Would Kenny be able to give a weighting to the various choices. أي. if KW.com was not available, would it be better to go for a hyphen, prefix/suffix or other TLD? And in which order?

On March 28th, 2010 at 12:43 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Just wanted to mention there are a few comments on this above, where Kenny's replied and said he prefers keyword.org over keywordsuffix.com or prefixkeyword.com.

In the video, he also mentions he prefers .com over .org, .org over .net.

آمل أن يساعد هذا

On March 28th, 2010 at 2:42 am
Victor replied:

I am sorry for having so much to say on this thread but it is a really important subject and so misunderstood that this is a great opportunity to clear up many of the myths surrounding this subject.

Google has an agenda, that agenda is to provide its users with the best search experience possible.

That is why it is where it is today, every body knows that they didn't invent search they just made it work better. I remember when they launched the reason they captured mind share is because the SERP's they presented where far more credible than any competitor at the time.

It was their “qualification process” that made their SERP's credible and over the last 10 years they have worked to continuously improve that process seeking to improve the standard of each and every SERP they present.

Each and every factor that goes into this “qualification process” needs to scalable over millions and millions of sites.

Each and every factor that goes into this “qualification process” is mathematically derived, that is the only way it can scale the way it does.

Each and every factor that we know to be factual about SEO is able to be explained clearly and logically –

eg

At the most simple level the quantity and quality of backlinks a site has affects its authority in the qualification process.

or a domain that has been under regular development over a period of several years is given a bias over a new freshly minted site.

or a country specific domain is given bias over a domain from another country in a local datacentre.

or a 100% exact match between the users search and a domain URL is a good logical indicator of the “intent” of a domains content

All of these factors make perfect logical and mathematical sense.

However the idea that a .com or a .net or a .org is given preference just “because its a .com” holds no logic or basis in programming and there are no qualification factors that Google would possibly value that you “earn” by owing one of these domains over another.

I accept that some people have seen better or worse results between the various global TLD's but the reason is not in the TLD itself it is less obvious logic.

You guys are programmers like me, I know you understand all the biases mentioned above and why they exist as qualifiers, there are so many factors that could serve as potential qualifiers that have more logic than this argument, heck how long the domain was registered for has more merit in this discussion than if it was a .net or .org.

Register for 1 year and you look like your a fly by night “red flag possible spammer” but 5 years is a commitment – forget that – that is not my point just that thinking that you get advantage between three possible extensions at the point of registration is wishful thinking.

By all means buy a .com because it will increase in value quicker than any other extension or there is a larger resale market or for the type in traffic just don't buy it because other TLD's are penalised or rewarded by Google somehow just because they are not .com's or .net's or .org's

When it comes to global generic domains it is what comes before the dot that biases SEO and for very logical practial reasons, when the domain name matches the users search string perfectly Googles logic says maybe that domain needs to go into the short list for further qualification and consideration.

Thanks for providing this kind of information. But I can't watch the video on web in my area. Would you mind to provide a download link of it? THX

وجدت هنا مبتدئ معلومات جيدة. لدي عدد قليل من المجالات ولقد مجرد الجلوس حول متوقفة فقط لأن في وقت واحد أو لآخر اعتقدت انني سوف تفعل شيئا معهم.

ولدي أيضا موقع أضع حوالي 2 قبل سنوات مع وورد مباشرة ويبلغ متوسطه حاليا 100 زائر في اليوم، وأنا لم مست ذلك منذ 09 مايو. في موضوع لا اعلم شيئا عن (طرحها لابني)، والآن ليس لدي أي فكرة عن كيفية كسب المال من ذلك.

قلت لك انا مبتدئ كاملة قبالة فعل الاشياء بشكل عشوائي.

في، 28 مارس 2010 في الساعة 12:46
برنت هودجسون فأجاب:

لو كانت لي، ويهمني ان طرح عدد قليل من المواقع WPD في تلك المجالات واقفة (كما فعلت مع موقع ابنك)، ومجرد الجلوس عليها.

لدي المجالات بضع عشرات من فعل هذا الحق الآن، ومعظمهم الآن تحتل المرتبة على الصفحة الاولى من غوغل عن الكلمات الرئيسية الخاصة بهم - دون أن تفعل أي شيء في الواقع لهم لمدة 6 و 12 شهرا 18،.

رد: كسب المال قبالة موقع - تحقق من وحدة الساموراي السوق لتسييل. هذا يساعدك على وضع الإعلانات، أو عروض المنتجات على موقعك لنقد ذلك.

ربما موضوعا جيدا لتكثيف في وظيفة أخرى وقال إن الجزء مع أسماء النطاقات الدولية. أجد أنه من المهم أن النسخة الألمانية من موقع على شبكة الانترنت ينبغي أن يكون لها اسم نطاق دولي كما هو الحال في، دي، أو الفصل في هذا الشأن. فمن أكثر فعالية بكثير لإعادة الموقع كله على ملقم مختلف مع اسم نطاق البلاد ذات الصلة المناسبة، من الحصول على موقع على شبكة الانترنت متعددة اللغات. التسويق عبر الانترنت وكلها يحصل أسهل لأنه يمكنك ربط كل مادة على بعضها البعض باستخدام وصلات النص. وسوف يتكلف هذا في المقام الأول أكثر قليلا لأنك جعل ودفع اثنين من المواقع بدلا من واحد ولكنها سوف تدفع في نهاية المطاف قبالة مع مرور الوقت.

مثل الآخرين وضعوا فإن infograph أكثر تفصيلا عن التصنيف العالمي للملحقات يكون كبيرا. أيضا استئجار يبدو من المثير للاهتمام معرفة المزيد حول إذا كان ذلك ممكنا.

What is the concensus on registering multiple domains for one website and parking them? Does the main domain name that the hosting was set up under gain the most value? And how much value do the other parked domain names really add to a website? Surely Google would figure out that somebody's collecing domains and therefore doesn't value them as much?

Very good information, Kenny
I have a question regarding the suffixes.
It's a good decision to add a suffix letter,
if the keyword.com is already taken?
Example. http://www.exactkeywordX.com?

Quick question:

Lets say I do own domain name washers.com but I do not rank well for buywashers.com

After watching this video it makes sense to register buywashers.com

Now…

1) Should I do a 301 redirect on buywashers.com to washers.com

أو

2) Should I add some content to buywashers.com optimized with that keyword and send traffic to washers.com

Probably #2 but would like to know your point of view.

شكرا!

شكرا على الفيديو. Would using a number be better than using a suffix. ie dogtrainingnow or dogtraining1 ?

Nice easy to understand videos Kenny. شكرا.

I think the statistics are harder.

In non competitive niches, the low hanging fruit goes to keyword rich domain names. I've seen all sorts of phrase match with modifiers for affiliate offers, rank well and constantly in the top 10.

I also see many niches where CONTENT ranks above a keyword rich domain which does not have content.

I also personally think that BRAND and easy memorable domains are more important to “people” who are the ones who “spend”, not Google.

So I think your money page is sensible and your keyword traffic sniffers could be as keyword rich as you can get, without looking spammy.

But it certainly seems that the early bird gets the worm.
The EXACT match domain owner with great content, should win the prime position. Assuming of course backlinks and so on…

I'm curious, has anyone seen a BAD SPELLING doman with LONG TERM ranking?

Nice one colonel sanders
بيتر

On March 28th, 2010 at 5:39 am
Brent Hodgson replied:

Agreed that it's important to make sure you have the fundamentals (good content, links, etc). As I mentioned in a comment above, a good domain name will magnify these things – but it doesn't replace the need for content and links.

“I'm curious, has anyone seen a BAD SPELLING doman with LONG TERM ranking?”

رقم

I used to have a domain that targeted a misspelling [bussiness instead of business] – but Google has closed most of those loopholes a long time ago – and I would have been better off focussing on a long term strategy for delivering value rather than trying to exploit an arbitrage opportunity.

This blog post confirms that what I'm doing is partially correct

Thanks!!!

Thank you guys for this video.
It explains very well the process for choosing an appropiate domain name for SEO.
I have just recommended the video on my site on web search engine optimization

Hi my question is about the keywords included in the domains.
For example buysomething.com, net,org etc are tooken, how would be best for the search engines: somethingbuy.com or something-buy.com

Thank you for the great article Kenny.

Not wanting necessarily to rain on everyone's parade but there is something else to consider here ( and yes,I'm playing Devil's Advocate!)

How about the day comes when Google decides that Key Phrases in content and Meta Titles are more important than KWP Search terms in the Domain Name ( which we are all, for the most part, focusing on here).

ie Google decides that 'buybluewidgetsonline.com' should not necessarily get 'bonus' points for having the search term in the domain url?

Google, after all, continually state that they want to present their searchers with the most relevant content right? Just because a KWP is in the domain name doesn't necessarily mean the content is relevant to the search.

Let's face it every IM person is trying to find Keyword rich domain names!

Think of all those Squidoo lenses and Wordpress.com sites etc. etc all fighting to get the KWP in the domain name to promote that latest IM offering. How hard ( or easy) would it be for Google to simply take that out of their ranking equation?

See what I'm saying here?

We've all got a bit complacent on this particular SEO factor I think and our SEO bubbles could be burst at any time if that's all we focus on.

Hmmm… How many of us would get seriously 'F%@^£d' should that ever happen ( and don't tell it me it might not!)

Sorry to bring some 'doom and gloom' to this excellent thread but it had to be said

Clive X

That's a good point Clive.

It would be foolish to only look at the domain name when optimizing.
I myself use the domain name, title, description and header tags to get my kws in as much as possible.
It's not always possible but every bit helps.

Hi guys,

With regard to suffixes to the exact domain name, what effect would a number at the end have to it's ranking/indexing chances in that niche?

Would love to know.

Keep up the good work

Paul H

Interesting stuff! Keep the info Coming

Hi guys,
Wow, great videos and I think I have learned almost as much from the follow up comments as the videos. Please keep it coming!
First a heads up for Victor, who said(March 27th at 6:23pm)
“These are the question we are looking for anyone that is a Market samurai customer has probably been doing this for at least a little while and is past “a .com is best” “then a .net” “or maybe .org” – great advise 10 years ago, can we have some real world advise for real world sites.”
I guess 2 years is “a little while”, at least I think so. The problem is that there are a lot of people and sites that are not clear, or just plain wrong in the advice they give. After having spent good money on bad advice, ( I own 2 totally useless domains and 2 marginal at best domains) the 10 year old advice you refer to, will keep me from repeating the same mistakes in a new way. Thank You Market Samurai!!!
Now my questions. My domain name only has a 44% keyword density, would adding a “/keyword” after the “.com” help my SEO efforts? Should leave off the part of the keyword that comes before the “.com” or not?
I have recently purchased Market Samurai, and truly wish I had found it sooner!

مرحبا،

كبير الفيديو! still confuse about which one is better?
ex : dogtraining.net or dog-training.com

شكرا

مرحبا

أنا مفتون أنا مع فكرة كثافة الكلمات الرئيسية في أسماء النطاقات، وكذلك الاعتقاد بأن المؤسسات الصغيرة تقرأ من اليسار إلى اليمين.

لذا، إذا كنت تريد اسم نطاق عن "قطع غيار الدراجات"، وأنا لا أستطيع الحصول على bicycleparts.com، وكيف الذكية فكرة هو الحصول على bicyclepartss.com؟ انها دينار كويتي مرتفعة جدا والمطلوب هو keyphrase في بداية اسم المجال.

شكرا